The corporate mantra “Utilise TCO instead of purchase price when making purchasing decisions” means evaluating a project’s Total-Cost-of-Ownership over its lifetime period as the primary cost factor. It requires the corporate buyer to scrutinise the entirety of the investment as opposed to just the upfront purchase price.

Like an iceberg, where the majority of the ice is below the surface, the total cost of ownership of a security system is typically much larger than the upfront purchase price. More often than not in today’s security purchases, the decision rests mainly on the purchase price, however, the intelligent and savvy buyer looks at TCO.

When purchasing a cloud based security system, TCO analysis is needed because the purchasing and expense comparison are quite different between a traditional on-site solution and a cloud based solution. You do not, however, need to examine every last item in the TCO to do a comparison between the two. This article focuses on the major cost variables worthy of comparison.

Components of Total-Cost-of-Ownership

Start-up costs: hardware, software, licensing, installation, configuration, engineering, network design, data migration, cyber security software, cyber security configuration, training, evaluation, purchasing time.

Operational costs: power, back-ups, hardware upgrades, software upgrades, OS upgrades, hardware repair, security patches, cyber security audits, cyber security reparation. And also: downtime? Repair? Data Export? Disposal?

Do we really need to compare all of the cost variables above over the operating period or can we narrow our analysis? We will assume a life of 5 years for our analysis. This is long for IT equipment, but average for security systems. For the purpose of this analysis, we are going to focus on the top six areas of difference between a cloud and an onsite video surveillance system. We have found that this yields an accurate comparison.

Total Cost of Ownership
With an on-site system, there are dozens of operational costs that need to be included

Six areas of simplified Cost-of-Ownership

  1. Hardware and Software Costs
  2. Configuration Cost
  3. IT Operational Cost
  4. Redundancy and Continuity Costs
  5. Maintenance & Warranty Cost
  6. Upgrades & Enhancement Cost

Hardware and software cost

The Hardware and Software Cost consists of 4 major components: Cameras, Networking, Recording and Analytics computers (DVR/NVR), and VMS Software. The difference in camera and networking hardware between an on-site system and a cloud system is negligible. The service provider will install nearly the same cameras and switches for either system and the difference arises from the Computer/DVR/NVR and the Software.

In the case of an on-site installation, a digital network recorder (prices range from $1,500 to $8,000 for a 15 camera system) will be selected and installed. $1,500 gets you basic recording functionality. $8,000 gets you a powerful PC with RAID storage and longer retention periods. If you need true redundancy, reliability, and encryption the hardware costs could reach $20,000. You need to decide at purchase time on the exact capabilities you need for the life of the system. Changes after the fact will be costly.

Once you add up all the operating costs of an on-site system, you will find that the TCO is well beyond the cost of a quality cloud-based platform

With a cloud system, the onsite hardware will typically be about $500 for 15 cameras. There is, however, no decision needed up front about the amount of storage, the features, or the capabilities. You have flexibility to change as you wish, when you wish.

Configuration and software installation costs

Configuration and software installation costs are significant for traditional VMS solutions. So significant that the problem is usually outsourced to a company that specialises in it. There may not be a line item for this, it may be buried in the purchase price of the hardware or software or it may be part of the installation cost, or it may be hourly.

Configuration costs escalate higher when you are coordinating multiple locations and want central management. Central Management will typically require an additional server. The more sites you have, the more individual systems must be configured and installed. With a cloud system, the set-up is minimal for the first site, and each additional site is immediately connected to the same cloud. All these setup, configuration, and software installation costs simply disappear for a cloud solution.

IT operational costs

The IT Operational costs are where most buyers fail to do an accurate analysis. On the cloud side, you pay a subscription cost - so the cost is clear. With an on-site system, there are dozens of operational costs that need to be included. Surprisingly, one of the largest costs is power. The US Energy Information Administration estimates the cost of powering an on-site server at $731 annually[1].

Power, bandwidth, back-ups, operating system updates, software maintenance, and data disposal are all things that every customer’s IT department has to accommodate. These are not optional costs, and they are not cheap.

Top 10 costs avoided by deploying a cloud system
Many costs can be avoided by deploying a cloud system

An IT department can choose not to invest in the operating systems updates, patches, and other software maintenance, but this dramatically increases the risk of cyber security vulnerabilities. Cyber Security has become the number one disruptive cost in the operating of on-site video surveillance systems due to the vulnerabilities generated by putting addressable devices on the company’s network.

If the devices vulnerability isn’t enough, there are inbound risks associated with opening ports and other networking requirements to enable users to see video from remote locations. Cloud systems do not operate this way. The stored video is viewed from the cloud and what transmits from the site to the cloud is encrypted. The cloud system avoids all the IT overhead, support, maintenance, power, and security issues of the on-premise system.

Redundancy and continuity costs

Another high cost in operating on-site systems is attributable to the system’s continuity and the redundancy of the video storage. Whether your company is seeking a simple off-site back up for security purposes or full disaster recovery, the achievement of redundancy in an on-site system can be easily 3-5 times the cost of the hardware and software system you’re running. In a cloud system, redundancy is already in the subscription. There is no incremental cost.

Once you add up all the operating costs of an on-site system, you will find that the TCO is well beyond the cost of a quality cloud-based platform. But we’re still not done.

Maintenance and warranty cost

Maintenance for on-site systems includes the hardware and the software maintenance for the DVR/NVR. There is typically a clear cost for the software maintenance at 20% per year. A hardware maintenance plan can be purchased as well to replace any broken hardware. There are clear costs to keep these running. The cloud solution does not have any of these costs, they are included in the subscription fee.

Costs over five years
Maintenance for on-site systems includes the hardware and the software maintenance for the DVR/NVR

Upgrades and enhancement cost

Finally, the concept of continuous enhancements. A TCO analysis should include the benefit of receiving new features and functions without having to do the work of installing them and upgrading the software or hardware. When you buy a DVR/NVR or licence a traditional VMS, you cannot benefit from any software enhancements without updating or replacing your system. The productivity and security benefits of this can translate into real $$ quite quickly. Upgrades can take one or more days of IT time, which translates to thousands of dollars.

Total savings on cloud systems

So, what’s the total savings? How much can you save by using a cloud based system? Unfortunately, there’s not a specific number because each company’s system is different. But there is a range. IT professionals frequently quote cloud system costs ranging from an increase of 15% to a decrease of 45% in cost versus an on-site system.

In some cases, it might cost a little bit more, but the customer receives reliability, redundancy, cyber security, and a lack of downtime and other headaches, making the extra cost worth it. In most cases, however, the customer receives a long list of benefits AND saves money. So, take a look at these factors on your system. Can you afford NOT to put your physical security in the cloud?

[1] US Energy Information Administration, January 2013 in conjunction with Ehow.com

 

Download PDF version

Author profile

In case you missed it

Smart home access control growth and the future of door security
Smart home access control growth and the future of door security

There’s growing noise around smart homes and smarter security. You’ve probably heard it. But there is a place where access control and more have been smart for decades: the workplace. Home automation and IoT are still playing catch-up with the commercial sector. A new insights report from ASSA ABLOY and IFSEC Global — “The Smart Door Locks Report 2018” — measures just how fast consumer smart technology is running. According to a survey conducted for the report, 61% of households now claim to own at least one smart home device or system. Energy monitors, home CCTV cameras, intruder alarms and smart door locks are the most popular, according to the report. All these functions, of course, have been available to businesses for years.61% of households now claim to own at least one smart home device or system Educating the smart home consumer Paradoxically, report data also questions how much consumers really know about their smarter home. A surprising 42% of those surveyed, for example, were unaware they could control a smart door lock from their phone. In fact, many leading smart door lock models offer this feature, delivered by Wi-Fi or Bluetooth and an app. Despite a wealth of features offered by the latest smart door locks — remote and location-based locking/unlocking; voice activation; timed access; emailed entry alerts; and integration with smart camera and lighting systems — most people still have limited knowledge of their capabilities.  Smart technology is increasingly becoming the new norm in terms of home security  Only 14% of survey respondents described themselves as “very familiar” with what a smart lock can do. Even though most of them probably use smart access control solutions at their workplace. Secure homes through smart technology Monitoring and security are not the only drivers for smart home adoption. We humans also love convenience, and modern living presents us with problems that smart home technology can solve. Ironically, given the report’s findings, it takes a smartphone to really unlock the convenient possibilities of smarter living. The device that’s “always to hand” is central to the newest generation of smart door locks.A smart door lock is a convenient way for a landlord or agency to offer round-the-clock check-in and check-out If homeowners wish to remotely manage property access for friends and family, many smart door locks oblige. You let in guests remotely, send them a virtual digital key, or provide a temporary or single-use PIN to unlock the door. It is just as easy to revoke a digital key, if you don’t want its owner to come around anymore. This is a significant improvement over sharing physical keys — or hiding one under the doormat. We cannot be totally sure where a metal key ends up and have no way to track or cancel it once it’s “out in the wild”. Commercial access control offers such functionality as standard, of course.  In addition, smart door locks offer more than just stand-alone operation and clever functions. In a domestic setting, magic happens when locks work in harmony with a home automation system, connected by protocols like Z-Wave, ZigBee or Wi-Fi. "Smart" security on the move  The smartphone is becoming a remote control for managing a connected life beyond just home (and even workplace) security. According to Accenture, the parcel delivery services market will grow by $343 billion by 2020. Just like home security, convenience is a major driver of change. Homeowners can send guests a virtual digital key to their phones, or provide a temporary or single-use PIN to unlock the door A recent PostNord pilot in Sweden aimed to remove the inconvenience of waiting home for a postal delivery. Selected customers of some major Scandinavian e-retailers could choose to have parcels delivered inside their front door, if it was equipped with a Yale smart door lock.  Home delivery is among potential smart services covered in “The Smart Door Locks Report 2018 ”. When asked whether the ability to receive parcels securely in a porch or lobby would make them more likely to invest in a smart door lock, 79% said it would.It is easy to revoke a digital key, if you don’t want its owner to come around anymore Holiday rentals and smart home tech ASSA ABLOY research published in 2017 forecasts continued growth in the European holiday rentals sector (at 5.8% CAGR). Smart door locks are also making an impact here, at both ends of the market: for service providers — agents and homeowners — and for travellers. A smart door lock is a convenient way for a landlord or agency to offer round-the-clock check-in and check-out, without creating extra work or staff costs. Both Intersoft, in Croatia, and Hoomvip in Spain have built holiday rentals management systems around an app and the ENTR® smart door lock. Agents issue, revoke, track and manage virtual keys for all their guests, saving everyone time and hassle. Travellers use their phones and an app to unlock their apartment. For these visitors the smartphone is already an essential travel accessory. It is a boarding pass, a credit card, a travel guide, and a postcard home... why not a door key, too? And if this key is backed by a trusted home security brand — and a company with vast experience in the mature market for commercial “smart” security — better still.

Bosch startup SAST addresses need for evolved solutions in security industry
Bosch startup SAST addresses need for evolved solutions in security industry

Security and Safety Things GmbH (SAST) is a new company that has announced its vision for an Internet of Things (IoT) platform for the next generation of security cameras. The Bosch startup plans to build a global ecosystem for the development of innovative security camera applications. Based on the Android Open Source Project (AOSP), SAST provides libraries, an API framework, and codecs for developers to work with. The SAST App Store will allow developers to build and market new applications, similar to today’s app stores for smartphone applications. We presented some questions to Nikolas Mangold-Takao, VP Product Management and Marketing, about the new venture, and here are his responses: Q: Why a new company now? What technology innovations have made this a good time to launch this company? The time is right to bring market needs and technological innovations together on one platform"Mangold-Takao: From a technical perspective we see two main drivers: increasing computing power at the edge and increasing internet connectivity, which will enable devices to directly communicate with each other and bring new technologies such as artificial intelligence also to the security and safety industry. At the same time, we see that this industry and its users are hungry for more innovative solutions – addressing new security needs while at the same leveraging the possibility to improve business operations for specific verticals, e.g. retail and transportation. The time is right to bring market needs and technological innovations together on one platform for this industry. Q: Why does SAST need to be a separate entity from Bosch? Mangold-Takao: SAST is setup as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bosch Group. We wanted to make sure that SAST is able to underline its role as an industry standard platform across multiple players. SAST is open to get additional investors and is being setup as a startup in its own offices in Munich to foster the environment where speed and innovation can more easily take place. Having said that, several entities of the Bosch Group are very interesting partners for SAST. The SAST App Store will allow developers to build and market new applications, similar to today’s app stores for smartphone applications Q: Please explain your "value proposition" to the industry. Mangold-Takao: We will bring new innovations and possibilities to the security and safety industry by providing an open, secure and standardised Operating System for video security cameras, to also address pressing issues such as cyber security and data privacy concerns. Devices that run then with the SAST operating system will work with an application marketplace provided and operated by SAST. Integrators and users can then use these apps from this marketplace to deploy additional functionality on these devices. With our platform we will be able to build up a community of app developers, including the ones not yet developing for this industry who have expertise in computer vision and artificial intelligence. Q: It seems what you are doing has parallels with the Apple and Android "app" stores. How is your approach the same (and how is it different) than those approaches? We are setting up SAST as a user-centric company and involve selected users very early on in the process"Mangold-Takao: The approach is similar in the way that we plan to generate revenue by operating the application marketplace and thus participate in the app revenue. The difference is that there is much more needed than apps and cameras to create a complete working solution addressing a user problem in this industry – we need to make sure that our own platform as well as the new applications being created will work as a part of an end-to-end solution. Q: "Critical mass" and wide industry participation seem to be requirements for your success. How will you achieve those goals? Will you involve integrators, consultants, or other parties in addition to manufacturers (to drive awareness)? How? Mangold-Takao: SAST is in close exchange with device manufacturers, integrators and consultants, as well as application developers and large end-users at the moment to ensure that we are building the right platform and ecosystem for this industry. We are setting up SAST as a user-centric company and involve selected users very early on in the process. We will run dedicated programs and hackathons to attract app developers, already active and new to our industry. We will also run selected pilots with end-users throughout 2019 to ensure we have all partners involved early on. SAST sees the industry is hungry for more innovative solutions – with the retail vertical market a target for these solutions Q: What timeline do you foresee in terms of implementing these initiatives? Mangold-Takao: While we start with first app development programs and plan our first pilots already for this year, we are planning our commercial launch for end of 2019. Q: How does your new company relate to the new Open Security & Safety Alliance (OSSA)? Mangold-Takao: The Open Security and Safety Alliance has been working very closely with SAST over the past year, defining some important concepts and elements required. One of the most important elements is an open and standardised Operating System, specific to this industry, which will then bring forward new innovative technologies and solutions. SAST is actively working on this Operating System, based on Android Open Source Project (ASOP), but is evolved and hardened with industry-specific features. Q: What's the biggest thing you want the security industry to understand about SAST? What is your "message" to the industry? Mangold-Takao: Our message is simple: let’s build better security and safety systems – together! But for real, innovating an industry is a joint effort, we can only bring new innovation to this industry with partners who share our vision and are excited about new technology. At the same time, we strongly believe that our platform allows every partner to bring forward what they do best but also invite new partners to our industry.

What is the value of remotely monitoring a system's health and operation?
What is the value of remotely monitoring a system's health and operation?

When is it too late to learn that a video camera isn’t working properly? As any security professional will tell you, it’s too late when you find that the system has failed to capture critical video. And yet, for many years, system administrators “didn’t know what they didn’t know.” And when they found out, it was too late, and the system failed to perform as intended. Fortunately, in today’s technology-driven networked environment, monitoring a system’s health is much easier, and a variety of systems can be deployed to ensure the integrity of a system’s operation. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How can remote monitoring of a security system’s health and operation impact integrators and end users?