The corporate mantra “Utilise TCO instead of purchase price when making purchasing decisions” means evaluating a project’s Total-Cost-of-Ownership over its lifetime period as the primary cost factor. It requires the corporate buyer to scrutinise the entirety of the investment as opposed to just the upfront purchase price.

Like an iceberg, where the majority of the ice is below the surface, the total cost of ownership of a security system is typically much larger than the upfront purchase price. More often than not in today’s security purchases, the decision rests mainly on the purchase price, however, the intelligent and savvy buyer looks at TCO.

When purchasing a cloud based security system, TCO analysis is needed because the purchasing and expense comparison are quite different between a traditional on-site solution and a cloud based solution. You do not, however, need to examine every last item in the TCO to do a comparison between the two. This article focuses on the major cost variables worthy of comparison.

Components of Total-Cost-of-Ownership

Start-up costs: hardware, software, licensing, installation, configuration, engineering, network design, data migration, cyber security software, cyber security configuration, training, evaluation, purchasing time.

Operational costs: power, back-ups, hardware upgrades, software upgrades, OS upgrades, hardware repair, security patches, cyber security audits, cyber security reparation. And also: downtime? Repair? Data Export? Disposal?

Do we really need to compare all of the cost variables above over the operating period or can we narrow our analysis? We will assume a life of 5 years for our analysis. This is long for IT equipment, but average for security systems. For the purpose of this analysis, we are going to focus on the top six areas of difference between a cloud and an onsite video surveillance system. We have found that this yields an accurate comparison.

Total Cost of Ownership
With an on-site system, there are dozens of operational costs that need to be included

Six areas of simplified Cost-of-Ownership

  1. Hardware and Software Costs
  2. Configuration Cost
  3. IT Operational Cost
  4. Redundancy and Continuity Costs
  5. Maintenance & Warranty Cost
  6. Upgrades & Enhancement Cost

Hardware and software cost

The Hardware and Software Cost consists of 4 major components: Cameras, Networking, Recording and Analytics computers (DVR/NVR), and VMS Software. The difference in camera and networking hardware between an on-site system and a cloud system is negligible. The service provider will install nearly the same cameras and switches for either system and the difference arises from the Computer/DVR/NVR and the Software.

In the case of an on-site installation, a digital network recorder (prices range from $1,500 to $8,000 for a 15 camera system) will be selected and installed. $1,500 gets you basic recording functionality. $8,000 gets you a powerful PC with RAID storage and longer retention periods. If you need true redundancy, reliability, and encryption the hardware costs could reach $20,000. You need to decide at purchase time on the exact capabilities you need for the life of the system. Changes after the fact will be costly.

Once you add up all the operating costs of an on-site system, you will find that the TCO is well beyond the cost of a quality cloud-based platform

With a cloud system, the onsite hardware will typically be about $500 for 15 cameras. There is, however, no decision needed up front about the amount of storage, the features, or the capabilities. You have flexibility to change as you wish, when you wish.

Configuration and software installation costs

Configuration and software installation costs are significant for traditional VMS solutions. So significant that the problem is usually outsourced to a company that specialises in it. There may not be a line item for this, it may be buried in the purchase price of the hardware or software or it may be part of the installation cost, or it may be hourly.

Configuration costs escalate higher when you are coordinating multiple locations and want central management. Central Management will typically require an additional server. The more sites you have, the more individual systems must be configured and installed. With a cloud system, the set-up is minimal for the first site, and each additional site is immediately connected to the same cloud. All these setup, configuration, and software installation costs simply disappear for a cloud solution.

IT operational costs

The IT Operational costs are where most buyers fail to do an accurate analysis. On the cloud side, you pay a subscription cost - so the cost is clear. With an on-site system, there are dozens of operational costs that need to be included. Surprisingly, one of the largest costs is power. The US Energy Information Administration estimates the cost of powering an on-site server at $731 annually[1].

Power, bandwidth, back-ups, operating system updates, software maintenance, and data disposal are all things that every customer’s IT department has to accommodate. These are not optional costs, and they are not cheap.

Top 10 costs avoided by deploying a cloud system
Many costs can be avoided by deploying a cloud system

An IT department can choose not to invest in the operating systems updates, patches, and other software maintenance, but this dramatically increases the risk of cyber security vulnerabilities. Cyber Security has become the number one disruptive cost in the operating of on-site video surveillance systems due to the vulnerabilities generated by putting addressable devices on the company’s network.

If the devices vulnerability isn’t enough, there are inbound risks associated with opening ports and other networking requirements to enable users to see video from remote locations. Cloud systems do not operate this way. The stored video is viewed from the cloud and what transmits from the site to the cloud is encrypted. The cloud system avoids all the IT overhead, support, maintenance, power, and security issues of the on-premise system.

Redundancy and continuity costs

Another high cost in operating on-site systems is attributable to the system’s continuity and the redundancy of the video storage. Whether your company is seeking a simple off-site back up for security purposes or full disaster recovery, the achievement of redundancy in an on-site system can be easily 3-5 times the cost of the hardware and software system you’re running. In a cloud system, redundancy is already in the subscription. There is no incremental cost.

Once you add up all the operating costs of an on-site system, you will find that the TCO is well beyond the cost of a quality cloud-based platform. But we’re still not done.

Maintenance and warranty cost

Maintenance for on-site systems includes the hardware and the software maintenance for the DVR/NVR. There is typically a clear cost for the software maintenance at 20% per year. A hardware maintenance plan can be purchased as well to replace any broken hardware. There are clear costs to keep these running. The cloud solution does not have any of these costs, they are included in the subscription fee.

Costs over five years
Maintenance for on-site systems includes the hardware and the software maintenance for the DVR/NVR

Upgrades and enhancement cost

Finally, the concept of continuous enhancements. A TCO analysis should include the benefit of receiving new features and functions without having to do the work of installing them and upgrading the software or hardware. When you buy a DVR/NVR or licence a traditional VMS, you cannot benefit from any software enhancements without updating or replacing your system. The productivity and security benefits of this can translate into real $$ quite quickly. Upgrades can take one or more days of IT time, which translates to thousands of dollars.

Total savings on cloud systems

So, what’s the total savings? How much can you save by using a cloud based system? Unfortunately, there’s not a specific number because each company’s system is different. But there is a range. IT professionals frequently quote cloud system costs ranging from an increase of 15% to a decrease of 45% in cost versus an on-site system.

In some cases, it might cost a little bit more, but the customer receives reliability, redundancy, cyber security, and a lack of downtime and other headaches, making the extra cost worth it. In most cases, however, the customer receives a long list of benefits AND saves money. So, take a look at these factors on your system. Can you afford NOT to put your physical security in the cloud?

[1] US Energy Information Administration, January 2013 in conjunction with Ehow.com

 

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version

Author profile

In case you missed it

HID shares tips for returning to the workplace post-COVID-19
HID shares tips for returning to the workplace post-COVID-19

Sooner or later (hopefully sooner), the novel coronavirus global pandemic will allow workplaces to reopen. But as we move into this recovery phase, there are many questions surrounding the transition. How can companies ensure facilities are in acceptable working order to reopen? How do they decide who is coming back and when? How will social distancing impact the operation of a company’s physical access control system? How can companies ensure that both visitors and employees are aware of the policy changes and extra controls? For answers to these and other salient questions, we called on Ian Lowe, Product Marketing Director of HID SAFE Identity and Access Management (IAM) solutions. “There’s no doubt about it: the global pandemic will change the way we live, work, and conduct business for some time,” says Lowe. “Over the past several weeks, we have been working with customers to enable a safe return to the workplace. We have observed that the number of challenges in the mid-to-long-term level and the associated complexity vary by location.” Lowe shares some of the proactive measures and best practices that can assist in a safe return to the workplace as we settle into a “new normal”. Challenge 1: Ensuring building readiness After being unoccupied for weeks or months, building readiness must be addressed completely before welcoming anyone inside. Even though employees may be eager to return, the workplace itself may not be ready. Companies may want to consider continuing remote work while facility operations are prepped. Challenge 2: workforce management There’s no doubt about it: the global pandemic will change the way we live, work, and conduct business for some time While it is dependent on location and industry, taking a phased approach is the best course of action when allowing employees, contractors and visitors back into facilities. First, facilities management will want to survey the property for readiness and then provide an estimate as to when employees may begin reporting back into the office. Next, it’s important to consider that office density needs are interrelated to the facility architecture. It is possible to accommodate a higher capacity of workforce in an airy, open office space than in a constrained one. A good rule of thumb is to start by introducing no more than 30% of employees back into the workplace at first. This could be a rolling group model in which the population total remains controlled and constant, but specific individuals vary from day to day. This option is good for a workforce that needs to be together in person but not necessarily all at the same time due to office density concerns. Welcoming visitors or customers into the office should be delayed as long as possible. If that’s not feasible, visitor numbers should be factored into the total density count. A cloud-based visitor management system can help with implementation. Challenge 3: Controlling access The ability to vet staff, employees, contractors and visitors before and during the return will vary greatly depending on the location. Policies should be implemented that require employees to be screened regularly — and for an extended amount of time. Look to answer the following questions: Where have you visited in the days since last entering the workplace? Have you come into contact with anyone else who has recently visited high-risk areas? Have you shown any symptoms of infection in the past xx number of days? Policies should be implemented that require employees to be screened regularly — and for an extended amount of time If there is cause for concern, refuse the visitor and/or supplement the screening process with additional steps. Temperature checking is mandatory in many organisations⁠— often multiple times a day. This applies to interactions at delivery bays, too. A policy-based physical identity and access management solution integrated with existing physical access controls makes it possible to enforce, monitor and report this type of activity. Challenge 4: Social distancing and contact tracing plan Social distancing may continue within the office, which will impact restrictions and guidelines related to access control. The office layout may be reworked for proper distance between cubicles, workplace positions and employees. Specific entrances, exits and pathways may be designated as one-way-only. Assigning Bluetooth LE beacons to employees once they are inside the workplace will allow companies to monitor proximity to others and measure localised density in real-time⁠ by using location services, contact tracing, and surge response technologies. Challenge 5: Reduced physical touchpoints Contactless technologies can help enforce social distancing and reduce touchpoints on common surfaces Reducing the number of physical touchpoints is desirable throughout a workplace. Contactless technologies can help enforce social distancing and reduce touchpoints on common surfaces such as faucets, doorknobs, coffee pot handles, etc. While introducing additional security checks and screenings, it’s important to not increase touchpoints and further infection risks. There have been more requests for a contactless experience to secure workplace access, including automatic doors and turnstiles, contactless cards and mobile access. Challenge 6: Communicating for confidence Proactive communication is key to provide reassurance that appropriate safety measures have been taken and that both visitors and employees are aware of the policy changes and extra controls. Equally important is to communicate a policy change – and the reasoning behind it – before it happens. While there may not be an exact expiration date on these new policies, ensuring that impacted individuals will have a safer experience is universally appreciated.

Elevated temperature screening is paving the way to Britain’s reopening
Elevated temperature screening is paving the way to Britain’s reopening

Technology has played a vital role in how businesses have enabled their employees to work productively from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. For those of us who can do our jobs from home you only have to look at the ‘Zoom Boom’ to see how much our working lives have changed compared to the beginning of the year. Despite the fact that those companies that can are now productively and efficiently operating remotely, the country is now facing the next challenge in this crisis: how to safely reopen workplaces for those who can’t. There is no argument that the economy hasn’t taken a hit during this unpredictable time. Shops, restaurants and entertainment facilities have been forced to close, and 23% of the country’s workforce (6.3 million people) has been furloughed. It’s no surprise that the Bank of England has warned that the UK is heading towards its sharpest recession on record. To counter this economic risk, the government is taking steps to slowly and cautiously reopen the economy by easing lockdown measures, sending people back to work and allowing businesses to reopen. With non-essential retail outlets now able to open from the 15th June, the question business owners face is how to operate safely and maintain social distancing practices, which are set to remain in place until such time as a vaccine is widely available. With lockdown easing and a ‘new normal’ on the horizon, the health of the country’s workforce mustn’t be forgotten in a bid to save the economy. This is why technology that can allow for a controlled return to work, while mitigating any risks to the health of consumers and employees, must play a part in the easing of lockdown. Temperature screening in the new normal Elevated temperature screening is one technology that should play a key part in return to work strategies and the safe reopening of businesses. This valuable solution uses a thermal and optical camera to analyse body temperature, which is a key indicator of the presence of a potential illness, and discreetly alerts the operator when the set temperature threshold is exceeded by someone screened by the tool. With temperature screening technology in place, the exposure of potentially infected individuals to others can be dramatically decreased and the risk of a localised outbreak minimised. Furthermore, for businesses such as retailers whose success is dependent on customers feeling safe to visit the premises, it has the added benefit of giving them additional assurances that visible measures for their protection are in place. In combination with other solutions, such as vigorous testing and screens to protect employees and customers, returning to work can be safe and controlled. With temperature screening technology in place, the exposure of potentially infected individuals to others can be dramatically decreased The reality of a ‘new normal’ may already be visible in some industries, such as grocery retail where one-way systems, plastic screens and constant cleaning are already in place. However, elevated temperature screening has countless applications for both essential and non-essential industries, ranging from offices and train stations, to hospitals and pharmacies. This screening technology allows businesses to take preventative steps to minimise the chances of the wider workforce and customers coming into contact with someone exhibiting symptoms of a potential illness. A number of businesses are already deploying this technology, such as Vodafone, which has deployed heat detection cameras at key UK sites to protect its employees. The camera used by the telco can screen up to eight people at once and 100 people per minute, while judging body temperature in less than half a second – all of which makes it ideal for congested and high traffic areas. Not all solutions are created equal Over the past few months, we have been inundated with images and videos of temperature screening taking place within key industries, which have continued to operate through the pandemic. However, the hand-held thermometers commonly being used require the device to be within an extremely short range of the subject and are only able to screen one person at a time. This is why remote elevated temperature screening solutions are so valuable – especially given that social distancing guidelines are unlikely to be relaxed in the near future. Stand-off solutions can enable temperature screening to take place without the need for close human interaction, further safeguarding employees and reducing the risk of contact with potentially infected individuals. Elevated temperature screening has countless applications for both essential and non-essential industries, ranging from offices and train stations, to hospitals and pharmacies Along with remote capabilities, there are a number of other crucial factors to take into account. The solution must be quick and easy to implement, as well as being highly accurate. When paired with a blackbody, the accuracy of temperature screening solutions can be within 0.3°C. Connectivity is also key and adopting an end-to-end solution linked to a centralised command and control location is invaluable. With holistic connectivity, these solutions can encompass cameras installed in multiple locations, and alarms can be viewed locally, remotely or on a smartphone app. This means that staff don’t need to provide direct supervision to the device on-site. With the guidelines regarding which industries and sectors can reopen changing on an almost daily basis, it’s important that these protective solutions can be installed without overhauling the surveillance infrastructure already in place. Looking ahead, adopting a solution with an upgrade path to other enhancements, such a facial recognition, is favourable as they can be used in conjunction with future and existing security measures.  Shop local Stand-off solutions can enable temperature screening to take place without the need for close human interaction Businesses have plenty on their minds as they prepare for the uncertainty that is sure to continue throughout the rest of the year and beyond. However, due diligence can’t be left to the wayside when looking to adopt an elevated temperature screening solution. There are high-risk vendors present in the market, many of which have been blacklisted in the US, and they must be given a wide berth. Buying British-made technology can alleviate these security concerns, as well as avoiding any logistical issues caused by the breakdown of global supply chains.  As the economy cautiously reopens, the country will have to adapt to a ‘new normal’ over the coming months. Elevated temperature screening solutions should be implemented by businesses to protect the health of the workforce and customers alike – ultimately paving the way to a safe and controlled return to work.

Which security technology is most misunderstood, and why?
Which security technology is most misunderstood, and why?

The general public gets much of its understanding of security industry technology from watching movies and TV. However, there is a gap between reality and the fantasy world. Understanding of security technologies may also be shaped by news coverage, including expression of extreme or even exaggerated concerns about privacy. The first step in addressing any challenge is greater awareness, so we asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: Which security industry technology is most misunderstood by the general public and why?