Download PDF version Contact company
The functionality of online wireless locks differs from manufacturer to manufacturer
Online wireless locks enable real-time online access control functionality

Organisations require more than a “one-size-fits-all” approach from their access control technology. Today, integrators leverage a mix of both online wireless and offline locks to provide a more customised system for each end user. By combining online and offline locks, integrators have the ability to expand the limits of an access control system, with more doors and greater capabilities than ever before. In the end, customers benefit from greater flexibility, enhanced security and improved affordability.

In this article Mitchell Kane - President, GM at Vanderbilt Industries explains some of the ways online wireless and offline locks are being used in concert to create right-sized access control solutions. But first we need to understand the limitations and benefits of each lock type.

Online wireless locks

Online wireless locks enable real-time online access control functionality on doors and in areas that, in the past, might have been inaccessible or impossible to get wire to. For example, consider an office lobby built on a slab, with a decorated marble floor, and an entrance that is all glass with highly decorated treatments. For cabling purposes, such a site is either extremely difficult or impossible to reach. However, with a battery-powered wireless lock, it’s now possible to bring online functionality to that portal.

There are a few potential limitations to online wireless locks. For example, some manufacturers have yet to solve the problem of form factor. Because wireless locks require batteries and an antenna, in many cases the locking units are larger, less discreet and less aesthetically pleasing than the wired locks available today.

Also, the functionality of online wireless locks differs from manufacturer to manufacturer. Rest assured, you’ll get the basic online lock requirements, but critical features like lockdown and the ability to toggle might be missing, depending on the make and model.

By combining online and offline locks, integrators have the ability to expand the limits of an access control system
Customers benefit from greater flexibility, enhanced security and improved affordability

Another consideration of wireless locks is the way they behave to conserve power. An “always on” lock will consume batteries very quickly, which could become a maintenance nightmare. To address this issue, many locks enter a sleep mode. The lock will wake into transmit-receive mode if a user uses their card or if someone uses a key and bypasses the lock. If someone touches the handle to exit, a request to exit will wake the lock.

Since locks spend the majority of their time sleeping, sending manual override commands can be challenging. For example, if a user wants to manually and remotely unlock a door because there’s a visitor waiting to get in, some online wireless locks won’t receive the command until the lock wakes up. To combat this limitation, you could touch the handle on the exit side of the door to wake it up so it can receive the command — which is obviously a clunky solution — or adjust the locks to wake on a more frequent schedule or even pulse their status. However, doing this means you’ll be changing batteries frequently and, even if you set the lock to wake every two minutes, that’s still too long for someone to have to wait for the door to open. Some manufacturers have solved this problem by including a low-energy wireless radio that can be pinged to awaken the lock. These do use battery power, but to a much lesser degree. Unless you’re using a lock with one of these radios, you should avoid using online wireless locks on doors that would frequently require administrator override intervention and battery changes.

There’s one final consideration for wireless online locks. Because the locks are wireless, they can’t be hooked into the building Class E fire alarm system for evacuations. Therefore, you can’t use the locks on doors deemed as fire exits that also need to provide for free ingress during the alarm state.

Offline locks

You need an access control system that is capable of concurrently supporting multiple electronic lock technologies
You must understand the pros and cons of each type of lock and also the environment you need to secure

There are two basic types of offline locks. The first requires someone to manually pull the data from the lock to update the access control system. The second is a tourless offline lock that is able to establish a data connection or network-on-card connection to the access control system.

Offline locks should typically be used in applications and areas where you don’t need real-time reporting of alarm events, like door contacts and break-ins. The overwhelming majority of offline locks being used today are in higher education residence halls. Another common application is in industrial/commercial applications where real-time reporting is not required, such as with low-value storage closets, bathrooms or offices.

Offline locks have an important limitation: Because the database is stored in the locks themselves, they can’t hold the same amount of card holder data as an online lock connected to an access control system. With most enterprise online systems, the number of card holders who can use a door is essentially unlimited. With offline locks, the number of users is finite and based on the make and model of the lock. Difficulties occur when these user limits aren’t identified or understood and the offline lock is used.

Finally, if you want to take a user out of the system, you can’t do so without going to each lock. Updating the database is done either on a schedule (often when batteries are changed) or after an event (e.g., termination of an employee or following a break-in). In either case, traditional offline locks require someone to visit each lock with a handheld device to pull the data. Depending on the number of doors, this “sneakernet” method can be far from efficient.

The best of online and offline locks

With most enterprise online systems, the number of card holders who can use a door is essentially unlimited. With offline locks, the number of users is finite and based on the make and model of the lock.

When it comes to electronic locks, it’s never one-size-fits-all. However, here are a couple general rules of thumb beyond the advice given above:

  1. If you have a room that contains anything of value that you want to protect and you require a real-time reporting and audit trail, you should use an online lock.
  2. In perimeter applications where you need instant control, it’s necessary to use an online device.
  3. Doors that do not require real-time communication with the access control system are ideal for offline locks. In these applications, consider offline locks as a way to eliminate traditional keys and to better and more affordably manage credential and access privileges.

One size does not fits all

A common mistake is to start with one lock type to solve one problem and then use that same lock in other areas despite completely different circumstances. You must understand the pros and cons of each type of lock and have a proper understanding of the environment you need to secure. You need an access control system that is capable of concurrently supporting multiple electronic lock technologies. Only then can you craft a solution that takes the best of offline and the best of online wireless to create a secure environment that meets the needs of all cardholders, administrators and facility management.

Download PDF version Download PDF version

In case you missed it

The physical side of data protection
The physical side of data protection

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has accentuated our digital dependency, on a global scale. Data centres have become even more critical to modern society. The processing and storage of information underpin the economy, characterised by a consistent increase in the volume of data and applications, and reliance upon the internet and IT services. Data centres classed as CNI As such, they are now classed as Critical National Infrastructure (CNI) and sit under the protection of the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), and the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI). As land continues to surge in value, data centre operators are often limited for choice, on where they place their sites and are increasingly forced to consider developed areas, close to other infrastructures, such as housing or industrial sites. Complex security needs One misconception when it comes to data centres is that physical security is straightforward One misconception when it comes to data centres is that physical security is straightforward. However, in practice, things are far more complex. On top of protecting the external perimeter, thought must also be given to factors, such as access control, hostile vehicle mitigation (HVM), protecting power infrastructure, as well as standby generators and localising security devices to operate independently of the main data centre. Face value How a site looks is more important than you may think. Specify security that appears too hostile risks blatantly advertising that you’re protecting a valuable target, ironically making it more interesting to opportunistic intruders. The heightened security that we recommend to clients for these types of sites, include 4 m high-security fences, coils of razor wire, CCTV, and floodlighting. When used together in an integrated approach, it’s easy to see how they make the site appear hostile against its surroundings. However, it must appear secure enough to give the client peace of mind that the site is adequately protected. Getting the balance right is crucial. So, how do you balance security, acoustics and aesthetics harmoniously? Security comes first These are essential facilities and as a result, they require appropriate security investment. Cutting corners leads to a greater long-term expense and increases the likelihood of highly disruptive attacks. Checkpoints Fortunately, guidance is available through independent accreditations and certifications, such as the Loss Prevention Certification Board’s (LPCB) LPS 1175 ratings, the PAS 68 HVM rating, CPNI approval, and the police initiative - Secured by Design (SBD). Thorough technical evaluation and quality audit These bodies employ thorough technical evaluation work and rigorous quality audit processes to ensure products deliver proven levels of protection. With untested security measures, you will not know whether a product works until an attack occurs. Specifying products accredited by established bodies removes this concern. High maintenance Simply installing security measures and hoping for the best will not guarantee 24/7 protection. Just as you would keep computer software and hardware updated, to provide the best level of protection for the data, physical security also needs to be well-maintained, in order to ensure it is providing optimum performance. Importance of testing physical security parameters Inspecting the fence line may seem obvious and straightforward, but it needs to be done regularly. From our experience, this is something that is frequently overlooked. The research we conducted revealed that 63% of companies never test their physical security. They should check the perimeter on both sides and look for any attempted breaches. Foliage, weather conditions or topography changes can also affect security integrity. Companies should also check all fixtures and fittings, looking for damage and corrosion, and clear any litter and debris away. Accessibility When considering access control, speed gates offer an excellent solution for data centres. How quickly a gate can open and close is essential, especially when access to the site is restricted. The consequences of access control equipment failing can be extremely serious, far over a minor irritation or inconvenience. Vehicle and pedestrian barriers, especially if automated, require special attention to maintain effective security and efficiency. Volume control Data centres don’t generally make the best neighbours. The noise created from their 24-hour operation can be considerable. HVAC systems, event-triggered security and fire alarms, HV substations, and vehicle traffic can quickly become unbearable for residents. Secure and soundproof perimeter As well as having excellent noise-reducing properties, timber is also a robust material for security fencing So, how do you create a secure and soundproof perimeter? Fortunately, through LPS 1175 certification and CPNI approval, it is possible to combine high-security performance and up to 28dB of noise reduction capabilities. As well as having excellent noise-reducing properties, timber is also a robust material for security fencing. Seamlessly locking thick timber boards create a flat face, making climbing difficult and the solid boards prevent lines of sight into the facility. For extra protection, steel mesh can either be added to one side of the fence or sandwiched between the timber boards, making it extremely difficult to break through. A fair façade A high-security timber fence can be both, aesthetically pleasing and disguise its security credentials. Its pleasant natural façade provides a foil to the stern steel bars and mesh, often seen with other high-security solutions. Of course, it’s still important that fencing serves its primary purposes, so make sure you refer to certifications, to establish a product’s security and acoustic performance. Better protected The value of data cannot be overstated. A breach can have severe consequences for public safety and the economy, leading to serious national security implications. Countering varied security threats Data centres are faced with an incredibly diverse range of threats, including activism, sabotage, trespass, and terrorism on a daily basis. It’s no wonder the government has taken an active role in assisting with their protection through the medium of the CPNI and NCSC. By working with government bodies such as the CPNI and certification boards like the LPCB, specifiers can access a vault of useful knowledge and advice. This will guide them to effective and quality products that are appropriate for their specific site in question, ensuring it’s kept safe and secure.

Data explosion: Futureproofing your video surveillance infrastructure
Data explosion: Futureproofing your video surveillance infrastructure

Video surveillance systems are producing more unstructured data than ever before. A dramatic decrease in camera costs in recent years has led many businesses to invest in comprehensive surveillance coverage, with more cameras generating more data. Plus, advances in technology mean that the newest (8K) cameras are generating approximately 800% more data than their predecessors (standard definition). Traditional entry-level solutions like network video recorders (NVRs) simply aren’t built to handle massive amounts of data in an efficient, resilient and cost-effective manner. This has left many security pioneers grappling with a data storage conundrum. Should they continue adding more NVR boxes? Or is there another, better, route? Retaining video data In short, yes. To future proof their video surveillance infrastructure, an increasing number of businesses are adopting an end-to-end surveillance architecture with well-integrated, purpose-built platforms for handling video data through its lifecycle. This presents significant advantages in terms of security, compliance and scalability, as well as unlocking new possibilities for data enrichment. All of this with a lower total cost of ownership than traditional solutions. Security teams would typically delete recorded surveillance footage after a few days or weeks Previously, security teams would typically delete recorded surveillance footage after a few days or weeks. However, thanks to increasingly stringent legal and compliance demands, many are now required to retain video data for months or even years. There’s no doubt that this can potentially benefit investigations and increase prosecutions, but it also puts significant pressure on businesses’ storage infrastructure. Data lifecycle management This necessitates a more intelligent approach to data lifecycle management. Rather than simply storing video data in a single location until it’s wiped, an end-to-end video surveillance solution can intelligently migrate data to different storage platforms and media as it ages. So, how does this work? Video is recorded and analysed on a combination of NVR, hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) and application servers. Then, it’s moved to resilient file storage for a pre-determined period, where it can be immediately retrieved and accessed for review. Finally, based on policies set by heads of security, data is moved from file storage to highly secure, low-cost archive storage such as an object, tape or cloud. Data is moved from file storage to highly secure, low-cost archive storage Long-term storage This process is known as tiering. It allows businesses to use reliable, inexpensive long-term storage for most of their data, whilst still enabling security pioneers to retrieve video data when the need arises, such as during a compliance audit, or to review footage following a security breach. In a nutshell, it offers them the best of both worlds. Scaling your video surveillance infrastructure can be a headache. Businesses that rely on NVRs – even high-end units with 64 or even 96 hard drives – are finding themselves running out of capacity increasingly quickly. In order to scale, security pioneers then have to procure new boxes. With NVRs, this inevitably involves a degree of guesswork. Should they go for the largest possible option, and risk over provisioning? Or perhaps a smaller option, and risk running out of capacity again? Common management console Security pioneers can easily add or remove storage capacity or compute resources – separately or together As businesses add new cameras or replace existing ones, many end up with inadequate surveillance infrastructure made up of multiple NVR boxes along with several application servers for running other surveillance functions such as access control, security photo databases, analytics, etc. This patchwork approach leaves security pioneers scrambling for capacity, maintaining various hardware footprints, repeating updates and checks across multiple systems, and taking up valuable time that could be better spent elsewhere. By contrast, flexible HCI surveillance platforms aggregate the storage and ecosystem applications to run on the same infrastructure and combine viewing under a common management console, avoiding ‘swivel chair’ management workflows. Plus, they offer seamless scalability. Security pioneers can easily add or remove storage capacity or compute resources – separately or together. Data storage solutions Over time, this ensures a lower total cost of ownership. First and foremost, it removes the risk of over provisioning and helps to control hardware sprawl. This in turn leads to hardware maintenance savings and lower power use. Many security pioneers are now looking beyond simple data storage solutions for their video surveillance footage. Meta tags can provide context around data, making it easier to find and access when needed Instead, they’re asking themselves how analysing this data can enable their teams to work faster, more efficiently and productively. Implementing an end-to-end video surveillance architecture enables users to take advantage of AI and machine learning applications which can tag and enrich video surveillance data. These have several key benefits. Firstly, meta tags can provide context around data, making it easier to find and access when needed. Object storage platform For instance, if security teams are notified of a suspicious red truck, they can quickly find data with this tag, rather than manually searching through hours of data, which can feel like looking for a needle in a haystack. Plus, meta tags can be used to mark data for future analysis. This means that as algorithms are run over time, policies can be set to automatically store data in the right location. For example, if a video is determined to contain cars driving in and out of your premises, it would be moved to long-term archiving such as an object storage platform for compliance purposes. If, on the other hand, it contained 24 hours of an empty parking lot, it could be wiped. These same meta tags may be used to eventually expire the compliance data in the archive after it is no longer needed based on policy. Video surveillance architecture Continuing to rely on traditional systems like NVRs will fast become unsustainable for businesses Even if your organisation isn’t using machine learning or artificial intelligence-powered applications to enhance your data today, it probably will be one, three, or even five years down the line. Implementing a flexible end-to-end video surveillance solution prepares you for this possibility. With new advances in technology, the quantity of data captured by video surveillance systems will continue rising throughout the coming decade. As such, continuing to rely on traditional systems like NVRs will fast become unsustainable for businesses. Looking forward, when moving to an end-to-end video surveillance architecture, security pioneers should make sure to evaluate options from different vendors. For true futureproofing, it’s a good idea to opt for a flexible, modular solution, which allow different elements to be upgraded to more advanced technologies when they become available.

How can the security industry provide affordable and cost-effective solutions?
How can the security industry provide affordable and cost-effective solutions?

Cost is a reality to be managed. No matter how powerful or desirable a technology may be to a customer, the sale often comes down to the basic question: Can I afford it? And affordability extends not just to the purchase price, but to the cost of technology over its lifespan. In addition to advances in technology capabilities, the security industry has also achieved inroads to make its offerings more worth the cost. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What is the physical security industry doing to make more affordable and cost-effective technology solutions for end users?