HDcctv standards’ goal is to serve the long-term needs of the industry and its customers rather than the commercial agenda of any one company

Editor's Note: HDcctv Alliance has announced that Dahua has opened its patented HDCVI technology to the global video surveillance industry as the basis for HDcctv's AT 2.0 standard. For additional elaboration on what the move means to the growing market for higher-resolution CCTV, we approached Todd Rockoff, chairman and executive director of HDcctv Alliance.

SourceSecurity.com: How is HDcctv AT 2.0 superior to HD-SDI or other previous approaches?

Todd Rockoff:  When it comes to HD surveillance local-site transport, there is a choice of technical solutions depending on what best fits the application in question. Each technology responds to a distinct set of customer requirements.

Ethernet is a flexible, general-purpose digital communication technology, and will always deliver higher-resolution video and potentially richer bi-directional communications than any specialised surveillance transport technology. However, special-purpose solutions are often better than general-purpose solutions because of their specific purposes; for example, even though Ethernet is pervasive in everyday office environments, most IT equipment also provides USB, HDMI, analogue audio, and other ports, in addition to LAN ports for Ethernet.

HDcctv DT (Digital Transmission) equipment is based on HD-SDI. DT equipment is exactly as reliable and nearly as convenient as conventional CCTV equipment. HDcctv AT (Analogue Transmission) technology is based on the HDCVI technology developed by Dahua. AT equipment is exactly as reliable and exactly as convenient as conventional CCTV equipment.

Neither AT or DT technology is universally superior to the other. AT works better in some situations, while DT better suits others.

DT transmits the original (digital) HDTV signal bit-by-bit across the cable. As a result, DT affords perfect bit-for-bit transmission. No other HD surveillance local-site transport technology can claim such an extraordinary level of quality. But – as with any other digital transmission technology – each of HDcctv DT 2.0, HDcctv 1.0, and HD-SDI requires a sufficient quality of cabling infrastructure to be effective. The main reason that first-generation digital HD transmission was considered slightly less convenient than conventional CCTV was that, in order to upgrade a legacy system with DT equipment, installers sometimes have to re-terminate cables, pull new cables, or insert repeaters.

Stringent third-party test procedures
and evaluation criteria will enable
the HDcctv AT 2.0 compliance mark
to stand as a guarantee of electrical
performance and multi-vendor

AT is analogue, meaning that the original HDTV signal is encoded as a continuous series of voltages. Although not every bit is copied precisely across the transmission link, AT delivers high-fidelity HDTV signals instantaneously. The specific advantage of AT over DT is that AT tolerates a broader range of cable qualities. The difference boils down to this: too much noise kills digital transmission – if the repeater or the receiver cannot detect a 0 or a 1 accurately because of noise, you lose the image, whereas analogue transmission always displays however much, or however little, noise that is introduced through the signal channel.

SourceSecurity.com: Given that Hikvision, the number one competitor in the video market, is unveiling a different technology (i.e., HDTVI), is there any plan to “converge” the two technologies or make them compatible? What might the HDcctv Alliance’s role be to accomplish that?

TR:  We are delighted that Hikvision shares our recognition of the growing importance of plug ‘n’ play (PnP) analogue HD surveillance equipment.

The HDcctv Alliance is an open industry body, whose standards reflect contributions from diverse member companies. All companies with an investment in PnP HD surveillance equipment are invited to join the HDcctv Alliance. I speak for all of the HDcctv Alliance Members in welcoming industry leader Hikvision to reinforce its commitment to the open, global standard and make its voice heard in the HDcctv Technical Committee’s weekly teleconferences.

SourceSecurity.com: Might not a proprietary non-standard technology from the market’s largest player undermine the positive impact of the standard? (i.e., set up a Beta vs. VHS type competition?)

TR: Absolutely! It compares to having to stock inventory in multiple formats (Beta/VHS or DVD/Blu-Ray/3D Blu-Ray) which inevitably multiplies the costs of running a video shop. And format confusion decreases revenues. A good example is a customer who accidentally brings a 3D Blu-Ray disc home but can't watch it on his DVD player.

Format confusion inevitably has the same kind of impact on the video surveillance market. Therefore, it is in the commercial interest of every company who has invested in HD surveillance equipment to fully support the open, global PnP standards for local-site transport of HD surveillance signals.

SourceSecurity.com: What were the considerations related to adopting the HDCVI technology as a standard beyond the fact that it was the first to market? How was it evaluated? What role did other companies and/or stakeholders (i.e., members of the HDcctv Alliance) play in adopting HDCVI as the standard?

The goal for the HDcctv standards,
reflected in the HDcctv Alliance
constitution, is to serve the
long-term needs of the industry
and its customers rather than
the commercial agenda of any
one company!

TR: While Dahua has led the writing of the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard, Dahua is by no means acting alone. The AT standard reflects contributions from many HDcctv Alliance Technical Committee participants located around the globe. The HDcctv Alliance Technical Committee has crafted stringent third-party test procedures and evaluation criteria that will enable the HDcctv AT 2.0 compliance mark to stand as a guarantee of electrical performance and multi-vendor interoperability. The AT compliance mark represents end-customer value, because it stands for out-of-the-box PnP.

The goal for the HDcctv standards, reflected in the HDcctv Alliance constitution, is to serve the long-term needs of the industry and its customers rather than the commercial agenda of any one company. The Alliance follows this process to manage successive generations of the standard (including HDcctv AT 2.0):

  1. Agree a statement of high-level market requirements
  2. Agree the technical framework to evaluate prospective proposals
  3. Solicit proposals from Members
  4. Understand the intellectual property rights and technical details associated with each proposal
  5. Harmonise the proposals
  6. Board of Directors approves the technical strategy
  7. Technical Committee hammers out all details
  8. Board ratifies

SourceSecurity.com: What forces must come into play for various manufacturers to “agree” on a standard, either AT2.0 or something else?

TR: Proprietary, sole-source interface standards rarely dominate markets. The closest example I can think of is Apple's various interfaces, and I would observe there a) Apple is a unique phenomenon of branding nature, and b) despite its brand visibility, Apple does not hold the largest market share. Surveillance customers demand out-of-the-box PnP so they can mix and match with ease. Experienced manufacturers, some perhaps still struggling with the challenges of the prevalent non-interoperability of Ethernet-based equipment, recognize that non-interoperability among diverse manufacturers’ analogue HD equipment would negate some of analogue HD’s advantages.

SourceSecurity.com: How is the HDcctv Alliance actively promoting compliance with HDcctv AT2.0 (HDCVI)?

TR: The Alliance has facilitated technology access for its Members and is supporting Members launching certified HDcctv AT 2.0 compliant equipment at Security China 2014 in October.

SourceSecurity.com: Could you see additional alternatives emerging and how might they impact the market? How might “competing technologies” impact HDcctv’s efforts to gain traction as an alternative to IP?

TR: It is difficult to anticipate a technology which has yet to be invented! The HDcctv Alliance remains open to any technical solution that uniquely addresses the requirements of the high-value segment of the HD surveillance equipment market.

SourceSecurity.com: What do integrators and end users need to know about HDcctv standards (and specifically HDcctv AT 2.0)?

TR: Look for the compliance mark to be sure. Marry certified AT 2.0-compliant equipment to other AT 2.0-compliant equipment, and enjoy PnP remote control upon power-up, straight out of the box.

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version Download PDF version

Author profile

Larry Anderson Editor, SecurityInformed.com & SourceSecurity.com

An experienced journalist and long-time presence in the US security industry, Larry is SourceSecurity.com's eyes and ears in the fast-changing security marketplace, attending industry and corporate events, interviewing security leaders and contributing original editorial content to the site. He leads SourceSecurity.com's team of dedicated editorial and content professionals, guiding the "editorial roadmap" to ensure the site provides the most relevant content for security professionals.

In case you missed it

Unlocking human-like perception in sensor-based technology deployments
Unlocking human-like perception in sensor-based technology deployments

Like most industries, the fields of security, access and safety have been transformed by technology, with AI-driven automation presenting a clear opportunity for players seeking growth and leadership when it comes to innovation. In this respect, these markets know exactly what they want. They require solutions that accurately (without false or negative positives) classify and track people and/or vehicles as well as the precise location and interactions between those objects. They want to have access to accurate data generated by best-of-class solutions irrespective of the sensor modality. And, they need to be able to easily deploy such solutions, at the lowest capex and opex, with the knowledge that they can be integrated with preferred VMSs and PSIMs, be highly reliable, have low install and maintenance overheads and be well supported. With these needs in mind, camera and computer vision technology providers, solutions providers and systems integrators are forging ahead and have created exemplary ecosystems with established partnerships helping to accelerate adoption. At the heart of this are AI and applications of Convolutional neural networks (CNN), an architecture often used in computer vision deep learning algorithms, which are accomplishing tasks that were extremely difficult with traditional software. But what about 3D sensing technologies and perception? The security, safety and access market have an additional crucial need: they must mitigate risk and make investments that deliver for the long-term. This means that if a systems integrator invests in a 3D sensing data perception platform today, it will support their choice of sensors, perception strategies, applications and use cases over time without having to constantly reinvest in alternative computer hardware and perception software each time they adopt new technology or systems. This begs the question - if the security industry knows what it needs, why is it yet to fully embrace 3D sensing modalities? Perception strategy Intelligent perception strategies are yet to evolve which sees designers lock everything down at the design phase Well, one problem facing security, safety and access solutions providers, systems integrators and end-users when deploying first-generation 3D sensing-based solutions is the current approach. Today, intelligent perception strategies have yet to evolve beyond the status quo which sees designers lock everything down at the design phase, including the choice of the sensor(s), off-the-shelf computer hardware and any vendor-specific or 3rd party perception software algorithms and deep learning or artificial intelligence. This approach not only builds in constraints for future use-cases and developments, it hampers the level of perception developed by the machine. Indeed, the data used to develop or train the perception algorithms for security, access and safety use cases at design time is typically captured for a narrow and specific set of scenarios or contexts and are subsequently developed or trained in the lab. Technology gaps As those in this industry know too well, siloed solutions and technology gaps typically block the creation of productive ecosystems and partnerships while lack of commercial whole products can delay market adoption of new innovation. Perception systems architectures today do not support the real-time adaptation of software and computing engines in the field. They remain the same as those selected during the design phase and are fixed for the entire development and the deployment stage. Crucially, this means that the system cannot deal with the unknowns of contextually varying real-time situations where contexts are changing (e.g being able to reflex to security situations they haven’t been trained for) and where the autonomous system’s perception strategies need to dynamically adjust accordingly. Ultimately, traditional strategies have non-scalable and non-adaptable competing computing architectures that were not designed to process the next generation of algorithms, deep learning and artificial intelligence required for 3D sensor mixed workloads. What this means for industries seeking to develop or deploy perception systems, like security, access and safety, is that the available computing architectures are generic and designed for either graphic rendering or data processing. Solutions providers, therefore, have little choice but to promote these architectures heavily into the market. Consequently, the resulting computing techniques are defined by the computing providers and not by the software developers working on behalf of the customer deploying the security solution. Context…. we don’t know what we don’t know Perception platform must have the ability to adjust to changes in context, thereby improving the performance post-deployment To be useful and useable in the security context and others, a perception platform must have the ability to adjust to changes in context, can self-optimise and crucially, can self-learn, thereby improving the performance post-deployment. The combinations of potential contextual changes in a real-life environment, such as an airport or military base, are innumerable, non-deterministic, real-time, often analogue and unpredictable. The moment sensors, edge computing hardware and perception software are deployed in the field, myriad variables such as weather, terrain as well as sensor mounting location and orientation all represent a context shift where the perception systems’ solution is no longer optimal. For example, it might be that a particular sensor system is deployed in an outdoor scenario with heavy foliage. Because the algorithm development or training was completed in the lab, the moving foliage, bushes or low trees and branches are classified as humans or some other false-positive result. Typically, heavy software customisation and onsite support then ensue, requiring on-site support by solutions vendors where each and every sensor configuration needs to be hand-cranked to deliver something that is acceptable to the end customer. A new approach for effective perception strategies Cron AI is building senseEDGE, which represents a significant evolution in the development of sensing to information strategy.  It is a 3D sensing perception and computer vision platform built from the ground up to address and remove the traditional deployment and performance bottlenecks we’ve just described. senseEDGE is aware of the user application reaction plan indication to trigger an alarm or turning on a CCTV camera The entire edge platform is built around a real-time scalable and adaptable computing architecture that’s flexible enough for algorithms and software to scale and adapt to different workloads and contexts. What’s more, it has real-time contextual awareness, which means that the entire edge platform is, at any time, aware of the external context, the sensor and sensor architecture and the requirements of the user application. Furthermore, when it produces the object output data, it also aware of the user application reaction plan indication, which could be triggering an alarm or turning on a CCTV camera when a specific action is detected. This approach turns traditional perception strategies on their head: it is software-defined programmable perception and computing architecture, not hardware-defined. It is free from the constraints imposed by traditional CPU or GPU compute dictated by hardware architecture providers and not limited to the perception built defined during design time. And, being fully configurable, it can be moved from one solution to another, providing computation for different modalities of sensors designed for different use cases or environments, and lower risk of adoption and migration for those developing the security solution.  Future perception requirements senseEDGE is also able to scale to future perception requirements, such as algorithms and workloads produced by future sensors as well as computational techniques and neural networks that have yet to be invented. Meanwhile, latency versus throughput is totally software-defined and not limited by providers of computing architecture. Finally, contextually aware, it is fully connected to the real world where the reflexes adapt to even the subtlest changes in context, which makes all the difference in time and accuracy in critical security situations. This is how CronAI sees the future of perception. It means that security and safety innovators can now access and invest with low risk in a useable and scalable perception solution that can truly take advantage of current and future 3D sensor modalities.

How businesses can prepare their communications infrastructure and critical event management plans for the next chapter of the pandemic
How businesses can prepare their communications infrastructure and critical event management plans for the next chapter of the pandemic

The global pandemic has created a working environment filled with uncertainty and, at times, fear, as COVID-19 cases surge yet again and businesses continue to navigate a complex web of infectious disease mitigation protocols and managing the distribution of a potential vaccine. Organisations are operating in an environment where a critical event, posing significant risk to its employees and daily operations, could occur at any moment. Even with a vaccine showing light at the end of a very dark tunnel, the pandemic unfortunately may be far from over, and the communication of accurate public health information to a widely distributed, often remote workforce is vital to keeping employees safe and businesses running. Organisations that plan ahead, invest in an emergency management system and share key updates quickly, reliably and securely, can keep employees safe while ensuring business continuity when it matters most. Taking time to plan and prepare Throughout the pandemic, U.S. offices have gone through alternating stages of reopening and re-closing Throughout the pandemic, U.S. offices have gone through alternating stages of reopening and re-closing. However, whether businesses are operating at a limited or full capacity, medical experts are expecting continuous waves of COVID-19 cases, as community transmission continues to hit record highs. The only way for businesses to keep their employees and customers safe, protect their operations, and retain trust with their key stakeholders during these tumultuous times is to be proactive in nature. Organisations need to put a business resiliency plan in place now that outlines key actions to take if (or when) an issue relating to local spread of the novel coronavirus arises. By having a plan in place and practicing it regularly, organisations can minimise risks and maximise employee safety surrounding critical events, such as suspected or confirmed exposure to COVID-19 in the workplace. Context of emergency management Ensuring the safety of employees (and others within the company’s facilities) needs to be the number one priority for organisations; and in any crisis scenario, a prepared and practiced plan maximises a company’s chances of success. In PwC's 2019 Global Crisis Survey, business leaders across a range of industries shared their experiences, expectations, and top strengths and weaknesses in the context of emergency management. By a wide margin (54% vs. 30%), organisations that had a crisis response plan in place fared better post-crisis than those who didn’t. When it comes to ensuring the wellbeing of staff, businesses need to think through a comprehensive, iterative infectious disease mitigation and operational continuity strategy and practice it as often as possible. Investing in proper technology A vital step in adequate critical event management planning is investing in the proper technology infrastructure For today’s modern organisation, a vital step in adequate critical event management planning is investing in the proper technology infrastructure to streamline the communication of vital information. Organisations should explore risk intelligence, critical communication and incident management software to keep their people safe, informed, and connected during critical events - and, thankfully, decision-makers are starting to take note. The Business Continuity Institute 2020 Emergency Communications Report found that 67% of organisations at least use emergency notification and/or crisis management tools. Reliable risk intelligence system Building upon that trend, a reliable risk intelligence system can anticipate and analyse the potential impact of incidents, such as increases in local cases of COVID-19, send vital updates to a distributed workforce of any size on multiple devices regarding infectious disease mitigation protocols and public health directives, and then help incident response teams virtually collaborate while maintaining compliance standards. Automating as much of this process as possible through technology allows human decision makers to efficiently and effectively focus their time, effort and expertise on what matters most in a crisis situation - implementing sound operational continuity strategies and, more importantly, ensuring employees’ safety and well-being are prioritised and appropriately considered when stress rises. Communicating vital updates This is the cultural component of incident management based on emotional intelligence, empathy, effective employee engagement, and authentic listening that makes or breaks an organisation’s response to challenging situations. Employees must be aware at a moment’s notice to stay away from or exit contaminated areas If employees are exposed in the workplace to a confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19, employers must be prepared to quickly update staff on vital next steps, as outlined by the CDC and other public health authorities, and arm key functions - such as security operations, HR, facility management, legal and compliance - with the information they need to mitigate potential spread of the virus, including:   Closing/cleaning the office: Employees must be aware at a moment’s notice to stay away from or exit contaminated areas. From there, it is critical that businesses communicate clearly with cleaning staff to follow procedure, use the right disinfecting products and sanitise high-touch surfaces. Alerting key groups that may have been exposed: Employers have a duty to rapidly notify workers of potential exposure to COVID-19. Having the proper communication infrastructure in place can streamline contact-tracing as well as the subsequent testing process, and save vital time. Ensuring work-from-home continuity or diverting workflows to alternative physical environments: Every work environment looks different today. Whether an organisation is managing a distributed workforce, full-capacity essential workers or something in between, there needs be a communication system in place to ensure business continuity. Outlining next steps for reopening: After a potential exposure, employees require the proper reassurance that they will be returning to a safe working environment in an organised, thoughtful manner, which is aligned to public health best practices. Whether it is coordinating a limited capacity return to the office or outlining new infectious disease mitigation protocols - such as steps for receiving a vaccine in the coming months - employees must continue to be updated quickly, comprehensively, and often. Incident management technology There is no doubt that organisations will continue to face a myriad of challenges as they navigate business operations during the pandemic into 2021, as the general public awaits the broad deployment of a vaccine. Public and private sector leaders still have months ahead of them before daily operations even begin to resemble “business as usual.” To best prepare for the next chapter of the global pandemic, organisations should outline a plan tailored to infectious disease mitigation protocols; explore augmenting their crisis management policies with risk intelligence, crisis management and incident management technology; and focus employee communications on containing and rapidly resolving events associated with COVID-19 exposure. Keeping employees safe, informed, and connected during critical events are mandatory considerations for leaders as they analyse existential threats to their business in 2021 and beyond.

What will be the security industry’s biggest challenge in 2021?
What will be the security industry’s biggest challenge in 2021?

What a year 2020 was for the security industry! There were vast challenges that could not have been foreseen at the beginning of the year. It is safe to say that the events of 2020 defied all industry prognosticators. However, is that any reason not to hope our expectations looking ahead to 2021 will be much closer to reality? Can we possibly benefit from looking ahead and trying to plan for the challenges of the year ahead? We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What will be the security industry’s biggest challenge in 2021?