Summary is AI-generated, newsdesk-reviewed
  • iDenfy's KYC combines AI and human review to combat synthetic identity fraud.
  • Manual checks address AI system errors, ensuring accurate customer onboarding and verification.
  • Synthetic identity fraud costs businesses billions, driven by advanced generative AI tools.

iDenfy, a prominent RegTech firm known for its expertise in identity verification and fraud prevention, has unveiled enhancements to its Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) platform. These updates address the growing issue of synthetic identity fraud, an increasing problem that has reportedly surged by at least 15% across various sectors, notably impacting high-risk areas like iGaming.

Amidst rising fraud rates, iDenfy emphasises the importance of integrating human expertise with technology. While software solutions are critical, they must be supplemented with manual reviews to effectively combat synthetic ID fraud. By sharing insights from its recent software updates, iDenfy spotlights its dual approach.

Role of skilled personnel

Domantas Ciulde, CEO of iDenfy, highlighted the company's substantial investment in its team, particularly during the first quarter of 2026. He noted that the expertise of the in-house KYC team is crucial for refining the product and ensuring thorough manual reviews of ID document data. This method mitigates false positives, enabling swift service access for genuine users. iDenfy's KYC specialists operate around the clock, ensuring continuous service without downtime.

Deepfake videos are used as disguises during biometric verification, further complicating fraud detection

Detecting synthetic identity fraud is becoming increasingly challenging. Fraudsters use real data, like Social Security numbers, coupled with fictitious names and AI-generated images to bypass simple identity verification systems. Additionally, deepfake videos are used as disguises during biometric verification, further complicating fraud detection.

Automation versus manual review

In response to these sophisticated attacks, traditional rule-based and AI-only security systems focus on known threats but struggle with new patterns generated by advanced AI fraud tools. However, fully relying on human review is not feasible due to the high volume demands of digital onboarding. iDenfy balances this by employing a hybrid approach.

iDenfy's system, upon receiving identity documents, conducts an immediate check across a vast database of over 3,000 government-issued document types covering 200+ regions. Preliminary checks, including facial recognition and liveness detection, are completed within three minutes. These steps are crucial in filtering out deepfakes before moving forward in the process.

Manual verification processes

iDenfy extends its services beyond initial verification through ongoing AML screening

Unlike platforms that rely on human review as a secondary measure, iDenfy's compliance team manually assesses each identity audit, going beyond simply addressing flagged issues. The team is trained to identify unique fraud patterns and anomalies that automation may miss, ensuring robust security measures.

iDenfy extends its services beyond initial verification through ongoing AML screening. This process involves constant checks against global sanctions, Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) lists, and adverse media to maintain compliance and mitigate reputational risks. For business clients, iDenfy's AI Company Reviewer automates KYB decisions, flagging suspicious cases for manual inspection.

Challenges of synthetic identity fraud

The economic impact of synthetic identity fraud is significant. In 2025, US lenders suffered losses exceeding $35 billion due to fake identities. Globally, synthetic identity fraud poses a threat of potential losses ranging from $20 to $40 billion annually, exacerbated by the capabilities of generative AI tools.

In summarising iDenfy's strategy, Domantas Ciulde stated, “Manual company reviews have been one of the most resource-intensive parts of compliance, and fully automated systems create a different problem: they can’t adapt in real-time to fraud patterns they’ve never seen. Our model is built on the premise that AI and human expertise are not interchangeable. They’re complementary. AI handles speed and scale. Our team handles difficult scenarios.”

In case you missed it

Responsible AI adoption starts with governance
Responsible AI adoption starts with governance

The eagerness to adopt AI in physical security is increasing as teams want to implement technology solutions for faster, smarter operations. At the same time, the conversations sur...

How AI-enabled cameras are becoming operational sensors that power safety, automation, and business intelligence
How AI-enabled cameras are becoming operational sensors that power safety, automation, and business intelligence

The biggest return on investment from an AI-enabled camera might have nothing to do with security. Organisations are increasingly discovering that the same cameras installed to pro...

Solink's AI agents boost efficiency of existing infrastructure with automation
Solink's AI agents boost efficiency of existing infrastructure with automation

Deploying artificial intelligence (AI) tools should be seen as a business initiative rather than a technology initiative, says Martin Soukup, CTO of Solink, a cloud-based video sec...