Wireless broadband bridges the gaps in wired infrastructure 
Bridging the gaps in wired infrastructure with wireless broadband
Today, public and urban business organisations have sophisticated geographically dispersed infrastructures, which require centralised supervision and the deployment of global security and surveillance networks. As the necessity for public and personal safety increases, the market and demand for multisite surveillance solutions with rigorous, video-based security standards is growing. One of the most recent challenges security professionals are facing is the deployment of viable, cost-effective security network infrastructures over multiple remote sites.  In this article, Alvarion brings to the fore the growing reasons for the adoption of wireless IP based solutions within the security market.

Benefits of IP-based video surveillance systems

In recent years, the video surveillance industry has taken giant steps towards infrastructure digitisation. This trend continues because digitisation enables them to replace the limited capacity and capabilities of analogue transmission networks with the innumerable opportunities provided by IP networks. In particular, IP-based systems offer easy integration and interoperability with a multitude of other systems, enabling the development of a range of innovative telecom infrastructures.

IP-based surveillance systems offer much more than simple visual supervision; starting from a single centralised computer, they offer a range of benefits, which include:
  • Real-time management and simultaneous surveillance of individuals and merchandise at multiple sites i.e. remote monitoring and security management
  • Top quality recording of sound and images
  • Control of traffic systems

The wireless alternative: A world of possibilities for communications networks

Such IP-based systems require an appropriate broadband network infrastructure. Today, there are a number of different options to obtain the necessary broadband access. This includes wireless broadband, which in many cases offers an excellent solution to bridge the digital divide in areas lacking a wired infrastructure, as well as an alternative to DSL.

Wireless broadband opens doors to 24/7 surveillance, which is inaccessible to most advanced wired infrastructures

The availability of wireless broadband technologies (wireless local loop) allows for the deployment of broadband communications networks when wired technologies and infrastructures are either unavailable or cannot provide the required performance. Such networks can also be deployed as a complement to existing wired networks, extending coverage and/or capacity and offering new possibilities for modularity and mobility.

Growing reach of wireless network solutions

Since wireless broadband access became available, IP radio network technologies have been evolving to provide more bandwidth, reach, quality-of-service, and security - all critical parameters for video surveillance applications. It is now possible to quickly and cost-effectively deploy networks of CCTV cameras in a range of areas, such as public places, commercial centres and industrial zones, in order to ensure security as part of urban video surveillance applications. The wireless infrastructure also supports Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) including smart video surveillance, enabling cities to deploy a system that allows for bi-directional streamlining - upstream from the surveillance cameras and downstream from the control centre - for enhanced traffic control. The advantage of such networks is that they can be deployed very quickly on affordable budgets, reducing operational costs and present the opportunity for utilising systems which cannot be deployed using wired infrastructure.

Various topologies are available for wireless networks
View larger image
Various topologies are available for different wireless network scenarios

For markets such as public transport or public security, wireless broadband opens doors to 24/7 surveillance, which is inaccessible to most advanced wired infrastructures. Wireless networks allow patrol vehicles to remotely share bidirectional videos, audio transmissions and other types of data with colleagues or management systems located in a single remote monitoring. Additionally, the same infrastructure can be used for Internet access, utilising the VLAN's feature.

Available topologies for wireless communications networks

Wireless communications networks use radio modems mounted on public or private buildings, water towers, poles or any other elevated structure in order to optimise transmissions. Area coverage uses point-to-point (PTP) and point-to-multipoint (PtMP) links, depending on the topology and the required architecture. Coverage can reach several kilometres (up to 30 km and more for a high capacity PTP link) and serve any type of public or private client.

  • PTP topologies only permit communications between two points. This topology is used either for connecting a single remote surveillance camera or for transmitting the flow of a pool of cameras to a remote security PC.
  • PtMP topologies consist of a central base station that concentrates the flow of multiple surveillance cameras on remote sites located at a distance from each other. They involve a modular infrastructure - which can evolve according to needs - in terms of capacity and coverage. Remote monitoring points can be added as required.
    Wireless networks allow patrol vehicles to remotely share bidirectional videos, audio transmissions and other types of data with colleagues  
      Wireless networks allow patrol vehicles to remotely share data and with colleagues
  • Mesh networks are another wireless topology. While these networks can be used for mobility applications, they are not cost efficient. Mesh networks are not suitable for quality video signals due to latency issues and because quality of service (QoS) cannot be guaranteed.

In actuality, all the different topologies mentioned above can be mixed, according to the video surveillance network configuration that will be deployed. In such cases, the project manager is responsible for defining the most appropriate architecture that will provide the best cost/performance ratio.

The following table summarises various scenarios for the deployment of a digital video surveillance network and recommended topologies:

Scenario Recommended Topology Comments
Connection of a single remote camera Wireless PTP system  
Connection of a remote site (on which several cabled cameras are grouped) Wireless PTP system, probably with high capacity This scenario includes connection of wired cameras to a switch installed at the remote site and wireless transportation of all video flows to a control centre located in another building.
Connection of cameras dispersed over an extended urban area Wireless PtMP system-modular system allowing the installation of additional cameras Rather than deploying one PTP link per camera, a simple PtMP system serves all the cameras, thus reducing the size of the central infrastructure and installation operations. This system may be completed by a local mesh network to economically reach cameras grouped over a reduced coverage area.
Deployment of several groups of cameras, with each group in a different area and/or direction in relation to the control station Wireless PtMP system will concentrate the cameras distributed in each area, and a wireless PTP system will carry the flow from groups of cameras to the control station The combination of two topologies allows a system with more available capacity to be built. It bypasses the cameras and the central site as part of a redundancy solution by overlapping the areas covered by the various PtMP base stations.

Wireless digital video surveillance likely to become the norm

Like many industries that depend on the ability to transfer data among multiple remote sites, digitised wireless networks offer the video surveillance market a number of important benefits:

  • Transportation of high quality video and audio signals from remote surveillance cameras
  • Real time sharing of data among all elements in the surveillance chain
  • Real and indisputable alternative to traditional costly wired infrastructures
  • Economical solution which integrates naturally into IP environments and offers flexibility and modularity

Wireless broadband allows security professionals to deploy a viable, cost effective security network infrastructure to ensure that public and personal safety needs are met. No wonder then that the market for wireless infrastructure for video surveillance in EMEA and Americas alone is estimated to be about $175 million in 2009 and projected to grow by 20% in 2010. As wireless broadband penetration grows, we may not be far from the day when wireless video surveillance becomes the norm!  

Alvarion Alvarion
Download PDF version

In case you missed it

How Internet of Things (IoT) aids facility management and physical security
How Internet of Things (IoT) aids facility management and physical security

As buildings become more complex and smarter, the age-old traditional maintenance methods that are based mostly on hands-on human monitoring are becoming more and more inadequate. Instead, the world is fast adopting building automation as a key component of smarter and more proactive maintenance strategies. The aim is to free up maintenance staff and give them time to focus on other tasks while machines monitor the different systems that work together to make the facility functional. Specifically, Internet of Things - or, IoT - enablement appears set to transform the way facility managers deliver service to building occupants. The trends are many and the possibilities are almost mind-boggling, from inventory management, to work scheduling and energy efficiency, the list goes on and on. Below, we look at a few ways in which IoT is being used for Facility Management and Security. Revolutionise maintenance through condition-based maintenance For years now, the norm among maintenance professionals has been a time-based approach, or in simpler terms, performing maintenance operations after a set period of time. But a major flaw of this system is that components were being replaced periodically whether the parts were actually worn out or not. Of course, that meant some of these maintenance activities simply weren’t cost-effective. To avoid this waste from continuing, a subset of IoT known as IIoT can now be used to optimise the maintenance process. IIoT works as a centralised network of connected systems and devices that can talk to one another and generate and relay data Rather than changing parts on a time-based schedule, IIoT works as a centralised network of connected systems and devices that can talk to one another and generate and relay data. Selected equipment are fitted with sensors that monitor specific operational parameters and let maintenance professionals know how the machines under supervision are working, understand their current condition, and then pinpoint the optimum time they need to be maintained. The information generated this way is vital as it allows maintenance staff to intervene just in time to avoid costly downtime and other associated inconveniences. This is, in a nutshell, the basics of predictive maintenance and condition-based maintenance. These days, by implementing condition-based maintenance, IIoT is being used to effectively monitor a wide range of systems such as lighting, HVAC, fire suppression, security, etc. The applications are numerous and so are the benefits. On page 52 of this guide by the US Department of Energy, they state that a functional predictive maintenance program could yield up to 10 times ROI, reduce maintenance costs by 25% to 30%, and reduce downtime by 35% to 45% Along with fire suppression, IIoT is effectively monitoring a wide range of systems such as lighting, HVAC and security Remote monitoring of facilities Physical inspections have been a critical condition for the success of conventional maintenance programs, even in hazardous environments. But, with the increasing emphasis on personnel safety, organisations want alternative solutions that allow staff to examine assets without being physically present. Facility managers and their team working in industries like manufacturing, oil and gas, and mining can relate with these constraints. And these industries can benefit greatly from deploying predictive maintenance solutions. For example, in the oil and gas industry, IIoT sensors can be used to monitor remote and highly critical assets. These sensors can be used on pipelines to detect anomalies (especially corrosion) and pass that information to supervisors for necessary action. By doing this, potential failures are quickly predicted to avoid often disastrous incidents. Managing energy consumption Sensors are also being embedded in building components and devices like HVAC systems, lights, doors, windows to understand energy consumption and proactively manage it. Facilities that use this technology could achieve substantial energy savings. In a press release by IT research and advisory company, Gartner, they stated that IoT can help reduce the cost of energy - as well as spatial management and building maintenance - by up to 30%. Looking at HVAC systems very closely, we see that they are a major source of energy usage in any building These sensors work by monitoring different conditions in the building and causing a power-saving action based on the data received. For instance, occupancy sensors can order lights to turn on when it senses motion in a room and then turn off the same lights when there is no presence there. That way, there is no need to wait for someone to remember to switch off the lights when they are not needed.   Another very common use is in HVAC monitoring. Looking at HVAC systems very closely, we see that they are a major source of energy usage in any building. So, the issue is how can one use IIoT to manage HVAC and possibly reduce their energy usage? Well, in its most common form, IoT-enabled HVAC works as a connection of sensors and thermostats that monitor factors like indoor air quality, temperature, and environmental changes then communicate with the rest of the HVAC equipment and make needed adjustments for occupants’ comfort. Not only that. IoT-enabled HVAC works as a connection of sensors and thermostats that monitor factors like indoor air quality, temperature, and environmental changes The technology can be configured to: Track energy consumption at different distribution points throughout the building. Track usage from the power source right down to the consumption point. Detect sudden voltage drops or spikes (usually an indication of some fault). These are essential benefits because HVAC units are notorious for consuming large amounts of energy when they are working inefficiently. Security and access control Smart surveillance is another important area of application for IoT in facilities management. It takes several forms such as the monitoring of life-saving systems like intruder or fire alarms, invisible barriers, and other safety installations. Facility managers are using IoT across different industries to obtain live information about potential emergency situations with a view to responding before the issue escalates. In such cases, quick detection of any strange activity is key because many of these installations have tangible negative effects when they fail or when they are intentionally sabotaged.Smart surveillance is another important area of application for IoT in facilities management Fortunately, the surveillance equipment can also be setup to send alerts to mobile phones to aid emergency response or evacuation as the case may be. Smart surveillance is also priceless for monitoring the situation in partially or fully automated remote facilities (especially oil and gas installations and mines), and in hostile environments with critical equipment where humans cannot work for extended periods of time. If you are not yet using IoT in your facility, you may be wondering where to start from. To avoid getting overwhelmed, a good place to start would be to try a small-scale deployment of this technology then review its ROI and impact on your operations before adopting a more widespread IoT implementation. This way you can gradually scale up as you and your staff come to understand and adapt and to this new way of doing things.

Is the physical security industry doing enough to prevent school shootings?
Is the physical security industry doing enough to prevent school shootings?

School shootings continue, as does a search for answers. What solutions are there to prevent school shootings and/or to improve the response (and thus minimise the death toll)?  In the physical security industry, we like to think we have solutions that can help, if not “solve”, the problem, but realistically speaking, how effective are they at the end of the day? We like to think we have solutions that can help, if not “solve”, the problem: but how effective are they at the end of the day? The sad answer – even after dozens of school shootings and even in the wrenching aftermath of the latest one – is that we don’t know. There is a gaping lack of knowledge and research when it comes to measuring the effectiveness of preventative measures as they relate to school shootings. Scarce resources on preventative measures The dearth of knowledge on the subject leaves schools at risk of spending scarce resources on measures that don’t have any real impact, or worse, that have a negative effect on education environments. The natural impulse following a school shooting is to do something – anything – to prevent the tragedy from happening again at any school, but especially at my school. But how is money best spent?Successful businesses are a good thing, but not at the expense of misspending education resources on solutions that don’t solve anything Congress has passed the Stop School Violence Act of 2018 to provide $50 million per year to develop programs to train students, teachers and law enforcement to prevent violence, and to create anonymous reporting systems, such as hot lines, for school violence threats. The bill authorises another $25 million for improvements to school’s physical security infrastructures. Congress also provides $1.1 billion in Title IV block grants, which districts can use to pay for diverse needs such as security systems. Several states are providing additional funding for physical safety measures and campus police, and local districts are also stretching their budgets to address security concerns. But is that money being targeted to measures that will help the situation? What is the role of technology in preventing school violence, and are we as an industry at risk of over-selling our preventative capabilities and diverting money from other measures that might have more impact? Successful businesses are a good thing, but not at the expense of misspending education resources on solutions that don’t solve anything. More metal detectors, armed guards and police officers could cause anxiety in some students and even interfere with the learning process Studies on school safety and protection Researchers, advocates and educators gathered this fall at American University to consider the need for better research to inform decision-making on safety, reported Education Week.The field is in desperate need of more evidence on what works, and schools want this information presented to them" A 2016 study by the Rand Corp. points to the problem: Lack of data and research on what works and what doesn’t. “Despite growth in the school safety-technology sector, rigorous research about the effectiveness of these technologies is virtually non-existent,” according to Rand. “The field is in desperate need of more evidence on what works, and schools want this information presented to them in vetted, digestible ways to help them with procurement.” Jeremy Finn, a professor of education at the University of Buffalo, has pointed out the difficulty of assessing the effectiveness of measures designed to deter events that likely won’t occur anyway. “How do you know when you have deterred a school shooting?” he asks. “It didn’t happen.” The effects on our students  Might technologies aimed at making schools more secure have an adverse effect on the learning environment? More metal detectors, armed guards and police officers could cause anxiety in some students and even interfere with the learning process. The physical security industry should freely acknowledge that the technologies we offer are only part of the solution to school violence Do security measures aimed at preventing active shooting incidents absorb resources that might better be used to address a more general and/or likely security threat such as vandalism or student discipline? Theoretically, security measures in general should help to prevent the probability of an active shooter at the same time they are addressing a wider range of concerns and threats. But do they? At the very least, we in the physical security market should be aware, and should freely acknowledge, that the technologies we offer are only part of the solution to school violence. Schools should take the broadest possible approach to the range of security challenges, and technology should be one tool among many. Furthermore, better data to measure what works is sorely needed to illuminate the best path forward.

How can the physical security market promote better employee retention?
How can the physical security market promote better employee retention?

Employee turnover is a problem for many companies, especially among younger employees who have not developed the philosophy of employer loyalty that was common in previous generations. Nowadays, changing jobs is the norm. The idea of spending decades working for a single employer seems almost quaint in today’s economy. However, excessive employee turnover can be expensive for employers, who are looking for ways to keep their brightest and best employees happily toiling away as long as possible. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How can the physical security market promote better employee retention in a competitive employment environment?