Summary is AI-generated, newsdesk-reviewed
  • SIA scheme enhances private security-police collaboration to combat crime, ensuring industry excellence.
  • Passporting allows ACS entry without inspections using current accreditations, but only initially.
  • All sub-contractors must be ACS-approved after year one to maintain scheme integrity.

Finishing our two-part look at the Government's ‘partial regulatory impact assessment' on the SIA's approved contractor scheme (ACS).

The document does say that among the SIA's aim is “to strengthen the extended police family by encouraging and supporting further engagement of the private security industry.  The scheme could be a key contributor in helping the police to tackle crime and disorder and reducing the fear of crime.” It does not go into more detail.  The document does suggest a market where ACS-approved guarding firms are the norm: “In the longer term, it is possible that most companies in the industry will be approved contractors and therefore there will be little effect on competition.  Companies will continue to compete, as before, on price, value and other benefits to clients.  The difference the scheme makes is to define a new minimum standard, or a new ‘level playing field' for companies to operate within.”

First year passport

Why have another guard standard, another hoop to jump through?  The document admits there are many standards in use in guarding, including ISO9000:2000, IiP (Investors in People), BS7858 (for manned guarding), BS7960 (door staff), NSI gold and silver schemes and other British Standards.  The document says: “There is wide support for the concept of ‘passporting' into ACS, requiring no additional inspections for companies with certain accreditations.”  But such ‘passporting' might only be allowed for the first year, because of purchaser and guarding fears that ‘inappropriate' firms could join the scheme.

Sub-contractors

What of the loop-hole that approved contractors can sub-contract to guarding companies that aren't approved?  They've thought of that one.  The document says: “It is proposed that after the first year of the scheme's operation, all sub-contractors used by approved contractors should themselves be approved contractors.  Otherwise companies could use unapproved sub-contractors while implying to clients that the contracts are being run under the scheme.”

Register

The document proposes a user group of ACS-accredited companies to give feedback to the authority.  The SIA will provide a register of approved contractors for purchasers: “Over time, this could lead to increased market share for approved contractors providing mainstream security services ... Insurance companies might offer discounts to approved contractors and their clients if it can be demonstrated that the risk of loss or the number of claims is lower.  The SIA will be discussing the feasibility of this with industry representatives.”

Download the document in full at ‘publications' at www.the-sia.org.uk

 

In case you missed it

How is the role of biometrics changing in physical access control?
How is the role of biometrics changing in physical access control?

Biometrics today provide better security and frictionless user experiences. Biometric identifiers like fingerprints, facial recognition, and iris scans are unique and difficult to...

dormakaba acquires Alliants for hospitality growth
dormakaba acquires Alliants for hospitality growth

dormakaba has signed a binding agreement to acquire Alliants Limited, the guest experience technology partner behind more than 100,000 hotel rooms for the world’s leading hos...

Allied Universal: Admired workplace in security industry
Allied Universal: Admired workplace in security industry

Allied Universal®, the world's pioneer security and facility services provider, has been named one of America's Most Admired Workplaces by Newsweek for the third consecutive ye...