IFSEC Global has announced that Microsoft CSO Mike Howard, security consultant Don Randall MBE and Baroness Neville-Jones, chair of the British Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), star on a 30-strong judging panel for its ‘Top influencers in Security and Fire 2018.’ Lead judge Grant Lecky, co-founder of the Security Partners Forum, drew on his extensive contacts network to appoint a diverse line-up of judges. He said: “Many of these judges were appointed based on strong recommendations and all are award winners themselves – often multiple times. They could hardly be better positioned to identify the next generation of influencers coming through.” Acknowleding security professionals “Several have even appeared among IFSEC’s influencers in previous years. Though being a judge bars them from appearing this time round, they’re all only too happy to ‘send the elevator back down’ to other professionals doing great things in the fire and security industries.”, he added. Lecky himself featured in IFSEC Global’s list of top influencers in 2014 and 2017. In the last year alone, he has won five prestigious accolades, including a spot on the Canadian Who’s Who and an Outstanding Achievement in Global Cybersecurity (OAGCS) Award from the Ontario College of Management and Technology. Judging panel for ‘Top influencers in Security and Fire 2018’: Ahmed Qurram Baig, co-founder, CISOCONNECT Baroness Neville-Jones, chair, British Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) Carol Osler, Senior VP, head of financial crimes, fraud management, enterprise project management Cath Goulding, head of IT security, Nominet David Burrill, co-founder, Burrill Green Denis Lauretou, Head of Security & Safety, chez Banque de France Diana Burley, executive director & chair, Institute for Information Infrastructure Protection Don Randall MBE, senior adviser, Pilgrims Group Dr Robert Docherty, MD, Flame Risk Solutions Francisco Poley Herrera, security director, European Federation of Security Directors GB Singh, editor, Security Today & Security Update Ian Moore, CEO, FIA Izabela Albrycht, chair, Kosciuszko Institute & CYBERSEC Jason Brown, national security director, Thales Lynn Mattice, MD, Mattice & Associates Lynwen Connick, CISO, ANZ Banking Group Martin Harvey, Tyco International Mike Howard, CSO, Microsoft Mike Hurst, vice chairman, ASIS UK chapter Pauline Norstrum, MD, NetVu Ltd Peter Houlis, MD, 2020Vision Systems Rachaell Saunders, CEO, National Protective Services Steve Durbin, MD, ISF Steve Lasky, editorial director, Southcomm Security Media Group Tacito Leite, director of security, Indra Theresa Payton, CEO, Fortalice Una Riley, CEO, iAudit Consultants Ltd Victoria Ekhomu, MD, Trans-World Security Systems Ltd & School of Management & Security Wendy Bashnan, Deputy Assistant Secretary General for Security, NATO Yvan De Mesmaeker, Secretary general of the European Corporate Security Association The top influencers in Security and Fire 2018 will be announced in the IFSEC Security Briefing to be held in May 2018.
Most of us have a basic instinct as to what is and is not ethical behaviour. But is instinct enough? “Ethics and the security industry is a balancing act,” says Mike Hurst, vice chairman of the UK Chapter of ASIS International. “Most people will have an instinct as to what ethical behaviour is, but there’s an absence of hard and fast rules.” Examples often crop up in video surveillance situations, Hurst says. For instance, when and where is it ethical to install CCTV cameras: in a store’s changing rooms to prevent theft? “It’s what is proportional and reasonable. To have security, you have to give up some privacy, but it’s a balancing act.” Ethical issues arising from investigation Big data is another area that can pose ethical issues. Some people see data collection as an invasion of privacy, while others see it as a useful tool for security. For example, to what extent is it ethical to use information extracted from an access control system on the habits and preferences of individual users, or to conduct predictive analysis to ascertain future threats? The investigations area of the security industry can also have ethical pitfalls. “I was told of an instance when a company, seeking to do business in the Indian sub-continent, asked a ‘reputable’ investigator to do some background checks on a potential business partner, only to be asked if they wanted to see his bank details as well, as this could be easily arranged by a small payment to a bank employee. The company declined the offer.” Is “blagging” (knowingly or recklessly obtaining or disclosing personal data or information without the consent of the data controller) ethical, even if the motives of the investigator are good? ‘Code of ethics’ “Most professional bodies and industry associations have some sort of code of ethics to which their members are expected to adhere. But it’s important to review such documents to ensure they are current and meaningful – a code of ethics should be a living document.” Although many companies may not have a formal written code of ethics, most will touch on ethical behaviour in employee handbooks, job descriptions or as part of any Corporate Social Responsibility policy, explains Hurst. But to ensure that these are more than mere words, the ethos of a company should be part of any induction process with sessions on ethics as part of ongoing staff training and development. Big data is another area that can pose ethical issues. Some people see data collection as an invasion of privacy, while others see it as a useful tool for security Ethical service attracts customers An ethical approach can be good for business. “Just contrast the reputations of, for example, the unethical producers of adulterated beef products during the horsemeat scandal a few years ago with those of, say, producers of organic natural yogurt. You need to behave ethically and then promote the fact to the wider world.” As with a Corporate Social Responsibility policy, says Hurst, if your business engages with your local community, that makes your staff feel good about themselves and adds value to being a member of that organisation. Many customers and consumers will pay a higher price if they feel that the service they are getting is more ethical. Security Code of Ethical Conduct This is a hot topic currently. Hurst recently attended both a roundtable discussion on ethics at Leeds University and an industry dinner organised by the Industry and Parliament Trust at the House of Lords. What is needed is to “bring together security membership and industry bodies to agree basic ethical issues and sign up to a Security Code of Ethical Conduct” that enhances the reputation of the profession, he says. “Corporate security managers may be involved in numerous areas of a business that may not be perceived as security issues: intellectual property; brand protection; Corporate Social Responsibility; so why not ethics?” Hurst contends that security managers and their teams are uniquely placed to “lead from the front” on this, benefitting their organisations’ reputations and bottom lines – and having a positive impact on society at large.