By upgrading its surveillance solution with Synectics’ Synergy 3 command and control platform, Salford City Council has been able to introduce important new ‘crime fighting’ camera technology, while also boosting incident and evidence management capabilities to better support and partner with the police in making the city a safer place to live.

City surveillance success

Salford is a city in Greater Manchester with a population of around 220,000 people and, like many other urban local authorities, is affected by a range of issues, from vehicle theft and fly-tipping (illegal dumping of waste) to anti-social behavior, violent and organised crime. The council’s CCTV team plays a crucial role in helping to tackle these problems.

Ultimately, we want to make Salford a safer place to live, work, and visit,” said Councillor David Lancaster, lead member for environment and community safety for Salford City Council, “which means we are always looking for ways to improve and adapt the resources we have to achieve that goal.”

From its central control room in Swinton, Salford City Council’s CCTV team monitors 120 cameras located across the city, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Councillor Lancaster continued: “Proactively monitoring activity, and being able to help the police to respond to incidents as efficiently as possible is a challenge in such a busy city. You simply have to have the right control system in place to prioritise public safety.

For us, Synectics’ Synergy platform was that system. Since implementing it in 2009 we had always found it easy to use and we’d never have any outage problems at all. So when we learned about the enhanced capabilities offered by Synergy 3, particularly in relation to third-party integration and evidence management, we could immediately see opportunities for improving public service, while also continuing with a solution we knew very well and trusted. In 2015 we made the decision to upgrade and haven’t looked back.”

Managing the evidence life cycle

Salford City Council’s CCTV team works closely with the police to detect, tackle and help prevent crime. Handling requests for footage review, tracking live incidents and safeguarding evidential data for investigative and prosecution purposes are part of daily life.

For Salford City Council it is also one of the key areas where Synergy 3 has delivered significant benefits. Councillor Lancaster explained: “The incident and evidence management tools within Synergy 3 allow us to efficiently capture, secure, store and share video footage with our police colleagues, ensuring that data integrity is maintained throughout.”

The ability to capture high-quality
evidential footage of this nature
means the police can often now
secure pre-trial guilty pleas

On spotting any suspicious, criminal or anti-social activity, operatives in Salford’s control room can immediately trigger an incident management process in Synergy 3 which logs all video footage, associated data and system activity in a temporary repository where it is SHA-2 encrypted and transferred to a secure evidence locker.

During and after an ‘incident’ operators can also add notes to the footage stored which, should the incident span multiple shifts, ensures continuity between members of the surveillance team. 

Synergy 3 also supports collaborative working with the police by enabling better audio and visual communication with officers operating across the city.

An integral two-way radio system ensures that potential threats and incidents are communicated quickly, ensuring that officers can be directed to – and updated on – events based on real-time intelligence, supporting rapid response.

The system upgrade also means Salford is now benefiting from multi-view capabilities – with operatives now tracking up to 16 cameras on a single monitor in order to better manage incidents, gather evidence and respond to visual verification requests from officers on the ground. Additionally, using ‘Follow Me’ functionality within Synergy 3, the council CCTV team can permit authorised officers to log-in and view live camera feeds remotely.

Making HD camera integration easy and effective

As an open architecture command and control solution, Synergy 3 is compatible with a wide range of third-party security, enterprise and data management systems.

At Salford, the ability to integrate third-party video has enabled the council to integrate its full range of legacy analog and IP cameras with third-party HD IP cameras that provide full-color surveillance in low light conditions. The council will also be able to easily introduce newer technologies, such as 4K cameras, as budget and needs dictate.

The result of Salford’s improved HD capability is that crimes taking place under the cover of darkness that were previously difficult to detect – drug dealing, car theft or burglary – are now visible and tracked. In one incident, a suspect was apprehended after night-time surveillance footage showed them checking the front doors of numerous houses on a single street to see if they were unlocked.

Having the ability to capture high-quality evidential footage of this nature means the police can often now secure pre-trial guilty pleas,” noted Councillor Lancaster.

Another major benefit of the council’s improved HD capability is that cameras can zoom into vehicle registration plates at a far greater distance, helping police to track suspects using number plate recognition. This has had a major impact on tackling the issue of fly-tipping, with 45 offenders identified since 2014. The image quality improvements also help with efforts to locate missing people by providing clearer facial details.

Driving operational efficiencies and generating income

Synectics’ hardware implemented as part of the upgrade has also helped the council deliver on cost and energy efficiency targets. For example, their new Synectics’ servers have reduced power consumption by almost half. On a five-year life cycle, the reduced energy and cooling requirements equate to £7,000 in savings as well as a significant decrease in rack space.

Meanwhile, the quality and reliability of Salford’s enhanced solution have been an important factor in the council’s ability to sell its surveillance services to parties such as schools, businesses and private entities including industrial estates – effectively turning a financial outlay into a potential source of income generation.

Our approach to surveillance and
how we use Synergy 3 means we
are catching more criminals and
securing high arrest rates
"

As part of efforts to attract customers, the council secured the British Standard 7958 for CCTV management and operation from SSAIB (Security Systems and Alarms Inspection Board). A key requirement for the standard is being able to justify the need for each camera monitored – justification Salford has easily demonstrated through using Synergy 3’s extensive and intuitive reporting capabilities.

To date, Salford is one of only a handful of public authority organisations to hold this certification. 

Facilitating future efficiency and crime fighting capability

It is not just Salford’s CCTV team that have been impressed by the solution. Plans are now in place for Trafford Council’s CCTV team to move into Salford’s control room, the aim being for the councils to share resources and expertise as they work to tackle crime in their respective cities. 

If our control room hadn’t had a resilient and dependable system in place, Trafford wouldn’t have even considered the move”, noted Councillor Lancaster. “The reliability and usability of Synergy 3, together with its open architecture and ability to integrate with the latest camera technology, ensures Salford is setting the standard for public surveillance in the North West.

Our approach to surveillance and how we use Synergy 3 means we are catching more criminals and securing high arrest rates, all of which allows us to make significant inroads into the overall reduction of crime and disorder, making Salford a safer place to live, work and visit.”

Download PDF version

In case you missed it

What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?
What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?

A basic tenet of sales is ABC – always be closing. But it's a principle that most professional salespeople would say oversimplifies the process. Especially in a sophisticated, high-tech market such as physical security, the required sales skills are much more involved and nuanced. We asked this week's Expert Panel Roundtable: What unique characteristics are required of salespeople in the arena of physical security systems?

Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?
Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?

A futuristic alternative to plastic cards for access control and other applications is being considered by some corporate users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. The idea involves using a microchip device implanted into a user’s hand. About the size of a grain of rice and provided by Swedish company Biohax, the tiny device employs passive near field communication (NFC) to interface with a user’s digital environment. Access control is just one application for the device, which can be deployed in lieu of a smart card in numerous uses. Biohax says more than 4,000 individuals have implanted the device. Using the device for corporate employees Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the deviceCurrently Biohax is having dialogue with curious corporate customers about using the device for their employees. “It’s a dialogue, not Big Brother planning to chip every employee they have,” says Jowan Österlund, CEO at Biohax. Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the device. Data capture form to appear here! “Proof of concept” demonstrations have been conducted at several companies, including Tui, a travel company in Sweden that uses the device for access management, ID management, printing, gym access and self-checkout in the cafeteria. Biohax is also having dialogue with some big companies in the United Kingdom, including legal and financial firms. Österlund aims to have a full working system in place in the next year or so. A Swedish rail company accepts the implanted chip in lieu of a paper train ticket. They accept existing implants but are not offering to implant the chips. Österlund says his company currently has no plans to enter the U.S. market. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive Access control credential The device is inserted/injected below the skin between the index finger and the thumb. The circuitry has a 10-year lifespan. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive. The only risk is the possibility of infection, which is true anytime the skin is pierced, and the risk is mitigated by employing health professionals to inject the chip. Use of the device as an access control credential or any other function is offered as a voluntary option; any requirement by an employer to inject the device would be illegal, says Österlund. It’s a convenient choice that is made “based on a well-informed decision by the customer.” Aversion to needles, for example, would make some users squeamish to implant the device. More education of users helps to allay any concerns: Some 10% of employees typically would agree quickly to the system, but a larger group of 50% to 60% are likely to agree over time as they get more comfortable with the idea and understand the convenience, says Österlund. Protection of information The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rightsIn terms of privacy concerns, information contained on the device is in physical form and is protected. The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. There is no battery. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rights. With use of the device being discussed in the United Kingdom, there has been some backlash. For example, Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), has said: “Microchipping would give bosses even more power and control over their workers.” A big misconception is that the chip is a tracking device, says Österlund. It isn’t. “We love people to get informed,” says Österlund. “If they’re scared or apprehensive, they can just read up. It’s not used to control you – it’s used to give you control.”

Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?
Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?

Should ‘Made in China’ be seen as a negative in security systems and products? It’s an important and complex issue that merits a more detailed response than my recent comment in the Expert Panel Roundtable. For me, there are two sides of the answer to this question: Buying products that have certain negative attributes that are not in alignment with some part of a belief system or company mandate. Buying products that do not perform as advertised or do something that is unacceptable. For integrators and end users making the buying decisions, the drive to purchase products may not be based on either aspect and instead on the product that can do the best job for their business. But for others, a greater emphasis on the ethical implications of purchasing decisions drives decision-making. What is ethical consumption? Ethical consumption is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favouredEthical consumption — often called ethical consumerism — is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favoured, and products that are ethically questionable may be met with a ‘moral boycott’. This can be as simple as only buying organic produce or as complex as boycotting products made in a totalitarian regime that doesn't offer its citizens the same freedoms that we enjoy in the United States. Consider the goals of the Boston Tea Party or the National Consumers League (NCL), which was formed to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. Some examples of considerations behind ethical consumption include fair trade, treatment of workers, genetic modification, locally made and processed goods, union-made products and services, humane animal treatment, and in general, labour issues and manufacturing practices that take these factors into account. Increase in ethical consumption The numbers show that ethical consumption is on the rise. In a 2017 study by Unilever, 33 percent of consumers reported choosing to buy and support brands that they believe are doing social or environmental good. In the same study, 53 percent of shoppers in the United Kingdom and 78 percent in the United States said they feel better when they buy products that are ‘sustainably’ produced. There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities Though the aforementioned question that sparked this conversation centres around concerns with products made in China, there are many other countries where, for example, governments/dictators are extremely repressive to all or parts of their populations, whose products, such as oil, diamonds, minerals, etc., we happily consume. There are also a number of countries that are a threat in terms of cybersecurity. It may be naive and simplistic to single out Chinese manufacturers. Impact on physical security products Product buying decisions based on factors other than product functionality, quality and price are also starting to permeate the security marketplace. While this hasn't been a large focus area from the business-to-business consumption side, it's something that should be considered for commercial security products for a variety of reasons. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating" There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Last fall, 30 U.S. companies, including Apple and Amazon, were potentially compromised when it was discovered that a tiny microchip in the motherboard of servers built in China that weren't a part of the original specification. According to a Bloomberg report, “This attack was something graver than the software-based incidents the world has grown accustomed to seeing. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating, promising the kind of long-term, stealth access that spy agencies are willing to invest millions of dollars and many years to get.” This, along with many other incidents, are changing the considerations behind purchasing decisions even in the physical security industry. Given that physical security products in general have been lax on cybersecurity, this is a welcome change. Combating tech-specific threats In early January, members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors and ensure U.S. technological supremacy by improving interagency coordination across the U.S. government. The bill creates the Office of Critical Technologies & Security at the White House, an indication that this issue is of critical importance to a number of players across the tech sector. Members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors To address a significant number of concerns around ethical production, there are certifications such as ISO 26000 which provides guidance on social responsibility by addressing accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests, respect for rule of law, respect for international norms of behaviour and respect for human rights. While still emerging within physical security, companies that adhere to these and other standards do exist in the marketplace. Not buying products vulnerable to cyberattacks It may be counter-productive, even irresponsible, to brand all products from an entire country as unfit for purchasing. Some manufacturers’ products may be ethically questionable, or more vulnerable to cyberattacks than others; so not buying products made by those companies would make sense. The physical security industry might be playing a bit of catch up on this front, but I think we're beginning to see a shift toward this kind of responsible buying behaviour.