Secutech Thailand 2017 proved itself as a leading security, fire and safety trade fair for Thailand and its neighbouring countries. The three-day fair drew 8,326 visitors from around the world. The show, held from 16 – 18 November 2017 at Bangkok International Trade and Exhibition Centre, hosted 150 world-renowned exhibitors and showcased a full spectrum of cutting-edge smart security solutions and technologies.

Market demand for smart security solutions

Commenting on the 2017 edition’s tremendous result, Ms Regina Tsai, Deputy General Manager of Messe Frankfurt New Era Business Media, said: “The success of this year’s Secutech Thailand relied heavily on the outstanding support from numerous government authorities, industry associations and our exhibitors and visitors. Thanks to this joint effort, we have been able to create a comprehensive and effective business and networking platform for the security industry. I am confident this will unlock a wealth of business opportunities in Thailand and the ASEAN region.”

The fair is recognised as a flourishing platform to help tap into Thailand’s growing security market The market demand for smart security solutions in Thailand continues to grow thanks to the Thai government’s proactive implementation of smart and safe city projects. To align with this emerging industry trend, the theme for the 2017 fair was, naturally, “smart and safe city”. To better showcase the most sought-after technologies connected with smart and safe city projects, the show was divided into five zones: the Smart City, the Smart Home Solution Center, the Z-Wave Pavilion, the UL Pavilion and the Intelligent Video Gallery.

CP Plus participates

CP Plus, an advanced security and surveillance solutions company, exhibited at this year’s Secutech Thailand and applauded the highly relevant fair theme. Mr Anand. S, Vice President of Asia Pacific, explained: “We see a lot of opportunities in the Thai market and it was an easy choice for us to be part of Secutech Thailand, especially considering its initiative to promote smart city projects. We are eager to explore the potential of smart city solutions and bring our leading global best practices to the market. We also see Thailand as a gateway to help us reach out to nearby markets. Overall, I am positive about the result of our participation.”

"It was an easy choice for
us to be part of Secutech Thailand, especially considering its initiative to promote smart city projects"

Hikvision Digital Technology

Hikvision Digital Technology Co Ltd, a well-known video surveillance company, also shared its optimism about the Thai market and the business leads generated during the fair. Mr Michael Guo, General Manager of Asia Business Team, shared: “Thailand’s market is booming because of the Thai government’s effort in promoting the smart city concept and upgrading various security systems within the country. During the fair we were able to meet with many professional buyers including government officers, system integrators and dealers.”

Z-Wave Pavilion

An integral part of the fair was the Z-Wave Pavilion which showcased some of the most sophisticated technologies in the smart home and home automation sectors. VDA, a global automation company specialising in IPTV products and technical solutions in building automation, was among the participating brands at the pavilion. Mr Rajiv Parrab, Group Executive of VDA Asia Pacific Ltd, remarked: “The fair allowed us to meet a lot of people who are from our target markets under one roof. We met developers, architects, implementation companies, system integrators just to name a few. All in all the fair has been very beneficial for us.”

Effective sourcing and networking hub

In order to help industry players make inroads into the developing ASEAN markets, the organisers of Secutech Thailand formed seven buyer delegations from Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore and Vietnam.

Mr Stefanus Ronald Juanto, Director of CCTV ALVA, joined the Indonesian buyer delegation and was pleased he took advantage of the opportunity: “I think the fair is definitely worth visiting. The organisers did an amazing job and the strong visitor flow proved this. Thailand and Indonesia are both striving to boost tourism and we both place a strong impetus on building smarter and safer cities to increase the number of tourists and investment opportunities. It was invaluable to learn from Thailand’s experience during our visit.”

"By sharing their invaluable insights and ideas, the speakers can help to
foster the development
of Thailand’s smart cities"

Valuable business prospects

Other visitors also discovered valuable business prospects during the fair. Mr Jerzy Zywicki is the Director of Digital Home Systems from Australia. His company promotes and distributes Z-Wave products and services. Sharing his experience, Mr Zywicki said: “I came to meet with our existing partners in Thailand and also look for new business leads. On the first day alone I met with five companies that I think we will have potential to work with in the future.”

Mr Thanachai Yingniyom, Senior Building Supervisor of Summer Hill Shopping Mall in Thailand, visited the fair to souce CCTV and fire alarm systems, and to explore innovations currently available in the market. He stated: “The fair is outstanding as it gathers a strong line-up of important brands such as Seagate and Dahua and displayed the latest solutions from the industry. We have visited several companies and will consider placing orders. I particularly liked the inventive fire alarm system by Taiwanese company Yun Yang.”

Future of smart and safe solutions

Held concurrently with the fair was the extensive fringe programme that included 13 conferences and events covering 35 sessions. Government officials and industry experts were invited to deliver their insights about smart and safe city development to the assembled audiences.

Proving particularly popular was the Thailand Smart City Master Plan Conference, which introduced the roadmap of developing smart cities in Thailand with key technology applications and successful case studies.

Mr Apisith Chaiyaprasith, HPE Government Relation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), attended the aforementioned conference. He noted: “When significant industry players including heavyweights from governments and commercial sectors are all lined up at an event then you know it is going to be worthwhile. By sharing their invaluable insights and ideas, the speakers can help to foster the development of Thailand’s smart cities and help resolve the challenges we face.”

Ms Joyce Yeh, Senior Manager at ICP DAS Co Ltd, delivered her presentation at Industry 4.0: Making Factories Smarter and Safer. She said: “The manufacturing industries are all preparing themselves for the unstoppable IoT and Industry 4.0 trends. I am happy to be here to share my thoughts and talk about the solutions that our company can provide. The feedback was great. We have attendees from Thailand, Singapore and Indonesia who are keen for more information about Industry 4.0. This provides us with a great chance to further our market promotion.”

Download PDF version

In case you missed it

What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?
What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?

A basic tenet of sales is ABC – always be closing. But it's a principle that most professional salespeople would say oversimplifies the process. Especially in a sophisticated, high-tech market such as physical security, the required sales skills are much more involved and nuanced. We asked this week's Expert Panel Roundtable: What unique characteristics are required of salespeople in the arena of physical security systems?

Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?
Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?

A futuristic alternative to plastic cards for access control and other applications is being considered by some corporate users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. The idea involves using a microchip device implanted into a user’s hand. About the size of a grain of rice and provided by Swedish company Biohax, the tiny device employs passive near field communication (NFC) to interface with a user’s digital environment. Access control is just one application for the device, which can be deployed in lieu of a smart card in numerous uses. Biohax says more than 4,000 individuals have implanted the device. Using the device for corporate employees Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the deviceCurrently Biohax is having dialogue with curious corporate customers about using the device for their employees. “It’s a dialogue, not Big Brother planning to chip every employee they have,” says Jowan Österlund, CEO at Biohax. Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the device. Data capture form to appear here! “Proof of concept” demonstrations have been conducted at several companies, including Tui, a travel company in Sweden that uses the device for access management, ID management, printing, gym access and self-checkout in the cafeteria. Biohax is also having dialogue with some big companies in the United Kingdom, including legal and financial firms. Österlund aims to have a full working system in place in the next year or so. A Swedish rail company accepts the implanted chip in lieu of a paper train ticket. They accept existing implants but are not offering to implant the chips. Österlund says his company currently has no plans to enter the U.S. market. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive Access control credential The device is inserted/injected below the skin between the index finger and the thumb. The circuitry has a 10-year lifespan. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive. The only risk is the possibility of infection, which is true anytime the skin is pierced, and the risk is mitigated by employing health professionals to inject the chip. Use of the device as an access control credential or any other function is offered as a voluntary option; any requirement by an employer to inject the device would be illegal, says Österlund. It’s a convenient choice that is made “based on a well-informed decision by the customer.” Aversion to needles, for example, would make some users squeamish to implant the device. More education of users helps to allay any concerns: Some 10% of employees typically would agree quickly to the system, but a larger group of 50% to 60% are likely to agree over time as they get more comfortable with the idea and understand the convenience, says Österlund. Protection of information The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rightsIn terms of privacy concerns, information contained on the device is in physical form and is protected. The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. There is no battery. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rights. With use of the device being discussed in the United Kingdom, there has been some backlash. For example, Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), has said: “Microchipping would give bosses even more power and control over their workers.” A big misconception is that the chip is a tracking device, says Österlund. It isn’t. “We love people to get informed,” says Österlund. “If they’re scared or apprehensive, they can just read up. It’s not used to control you – it’s used to give you control.”

Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?
Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?

Should ‘Made in China’ be seen as a negative in security systems and products? It’s an important and complex issue that merits a more detailed response than my recent comment in the Expert Panel Roundtable. For me, there are two sides of the answer to this question: Buying products that have certain negative attributes that are not in alignment with some part of a belief system or company mandate. Buying products that do not perform as advertised or do something that is unacceptable. For integrators and end users making the buying decisions, the drive to purchase products may not be based on either aspect and instead on the product that can do the best job for their business. But for others, a greater emphasis on the ethical implications of purchasing decisions drives decision-making. What is ethical consumption? Ethical consumption is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favouredEthical consumption — often called ethical consumerism — is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favoured, and products that are ethically questionable may be met with a ‘moral boycott’. This can be as simple as only buying organic produce or as complex as boycotting products made in a totalitarian regime that doesn't offer its citizens the same freedoms that we enjoy in the United States. Consider the goals of the Boston Tea Party or the National Consumers League (NCL), which was formed to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. Some examples of considerations behind ethical consumption include fair trade, treatment of workers, genetic modification, locally made and processed goods, union-made products and services, humane animal treatment, and in general, labour issues and manufacturing practices that take these factors into account. Increase in ethical consumption The numbers show that ethical consumption is on the rise. In a 2017 study by Unilever, 33 percent of consumers reported choosing to buy and support brands that they believe are doing social or environmental good. In the same study, 53 percent of shoppers in the United Kingdom and 78 percent in the United States said they feel better when they buy products that are ‘sustainably’ produced. There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities Though the aforementioned question that sparked this conversation centres around concerns with products made in China, there are many other countries where, for example, governments/dictators are extremely repressive to all or parts of their populations, whose products, such as oil, diamonds, minerals, etc., we happily consume. There are also a number of countries that are a threat in terms of cybersecurity. It may be naive and simplistic to single out Chinese manufacturers. Impact on physical security products Product buying decisions based on factors other than product functionality, quality and price are also starting to permeate the security marketplace. While this hasn't been a large focus area from the business-to-business consumption side, it's something that should be considered for commercial security products for a variety of reasons. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating" There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Last fall, 30 U.S. companies, including Apple and Amazon, were potentially compromised when it was discovered that a tiny microchip in the motherboard of servers built in China that weren't a part of the original specification. According to a Bloomberg report, “This attack was something graver than the software-based incidents the world has grown accustomed to seeing. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating, promising the kind of long-term, stealth access that spy agencies are willing to invest millions of dollars and many years to get.” This, along with many other incidents, are changing the considerations behind purchasing decisions even in the physical security industry. Given that physical security products in general have been lax on cybersecurity, this is a welcome change. Combating tech-specific threats In early January, members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors and ensure U.S. technological supremacy by improving interagency coordination across the U.S. government. The bill creates the Office of Critical Technologies & Security at the White House, an indication that this issue is of critical importance to a number of players across the tech sector. Members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors To address a significant number of concerns around ethical production, there are certifications such as ISO 26000 which provides guidance on social responsibility by addressing accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests, respect for rule of law, respect for international norms of behaviour and respect for human rights. While still emerging within physical security, companies that adhere to these and other standards do exist in the marketplace. Not buying products vulnerable to cyberattacks It may be counter-productive, even irresponsible, to brand all products from an entire country as unfit for purchasing. Some manufacturers’ products may be ethically questionable, or more vulnerable to cyberattacks than others; so not buying products made by those companies would make sense. The physical security industry might be playing a bit of catch up on this front, but I think we're beginning to see a shift toward this kind of responsible buying behaviour.