Data centres are a challenging domain, the success of which depends on security of client data. Most data centres store data for more than one organisation. It is very crucial for the data centres to prevent any unauthorised access of data.

Matrix offers a solution whereby data racks are secured biometrically, with records of every access along with its duration. Only authorised person can access specific racks for the stipulated time using biometric verification.

The solution is available in two forms. Time- and user-based rack access with a single biometric device.

Time-based rack access

This form of access control proceeds in the following manner.Once the user completes authentication, he will be able to select the racks to be accessed from a list of accessible racks

Data centre authentication: User shows biometric credentials to access the data centre

Data centre access allowed: Once user is allowed access, he/she will move towards rack access authentication.

Rack authentication: User will click on the screen and authenticate his/her identity through a biometric device placed alongside the screen.

Rack selection: Once user completes the authentication process for gaining access to respective racks, he will be able to select the racks to be accessed from a list of accessible racks.

Rack access allowed: Finally, the user will perform his assigned task within the defined time period.

Centralised biometric authentication

Biometrics provides high-end security over RFID, and hence integrating biometrics with access control solution fetches complete security for data centres. Usually, an employee is required to punch twice in order to access the data rack of his/her organisation.

First Punch: A biometric device will be installed at the entrance of the data centre. A user will punch on the device and accordingly he/she will be granted/denied access. This authentication ensures that an authorised user is trying to access the data centre.

Second Punch: Once user is granted access, he/she will punch again at the device installed near the screen in order to access the respective racks. Once user punches, the screen will display the list of racks that he/she is allowed to access. For example – when ‘X’ employee of ‘ABC Organisation’ punches the second time, the screen will display a list of ABC Organisation racks that are allotted to him. The user then needs to select the racks that he wants to access and accordingly he/she will be granted access.Every rack that is allocated to a company can only be accessed for a definite period of time

Pre-defined rack access

Every company has designated racks allotted to them. The admin can define the racks company-wise, which means whenever a user makes his second punch – a list with racks allotted to his/her respective company will be displayed on the screen.

This feature acts as a USP for data centres as they can ensure that a rack of company ‘X’ will not be accessible to or misused by an employee of company ‘Y’.

Every rack that is allocated to a company can only be accessed for a definite period of time. The admin can set the duration and accordingly users can access their respective racks for the stipulated time period.

User-based rack access

The process of user-based access control proceeds as follows:

  • Data centre authentication: User shows biometric credentials to access the data centre
  • Data centre access allowed: Once user is allowed access, he/she will move towards rack access authentication.
  • Rack authentication: User will show biometric credentials to access the rack.

Centralised authentication and control

User-based access differs from time-based access in this following manner.If the user is authenticated he/she will be allowed to work in the rack for a pre-defined period of time and once finished

First punch with two level authentication: A biometric device will be installed at the entrance of data centre. User will show card or enter the pin code and then biometric credentials on the device and accordingly he/she will be granted/denied access. This authentication ensures that an authorised user is trying to access the data centre. Two-level authentication improves the security level.

Second punch: User will move to the rack and show his/her biometric credential on the device installed at the rack. If the user is authenticated he/she will be allowed to work in the rack for a pre-defined period of time and once finished, the device will close the door automatically.

Admin can define the racks company-wise, which means whenever a user makes his second punch – a list of ABC Organisation racks that are allotted to him will be displayed on the screen.

This feature acts as USP for data centres as they can ensure that a rack of company 'X' will not be accessible to or misused by employee of company 'Y'.Through Matrix's Access Control slution, data centres can manage each and every company’s rack virtually along with enhancing the security

Integration with video surveillance

Matrix Access Control solution for data centres can be integrated with video surveillance solutions. Hence, when a user tries to access the data centre through the biometric device, an image gets captured. In case of unauthorised access, having an image can prove helpful for data centres.

As for time-based rack access, every rack is accessible for a definite period of time, and the admin can set the duration.

Data centres have data of more than one organisation stored in a single location. Managing the data racks is a cumbersome process for data centres. Through this solution, data centres can manage each and every company’s rack virtually along with enhancing the security.

Benefits of user-based access control

The solution provides reports in the form of:

  • ‘Which’ rack is accessed by ‘whom’, ‘when’ and for ‘what’ time-duration
  • Records related to rack accessibility, time duration, etc.
  • Alarm for a rack held open for too long, access denied events, etc.

From the data centre point of view, this system offers the following advantages:

  • Easy maintenance of diverse data
  • Accurate record of access allowed/denied in the software
  • No manual security required
  • Easy data rack management of various companies in a single location

In addition, from the company point of view, it is beneficial in the following ways:

  • Complete security of company data
  • Accurate records of who accessed data at what time

Target user profile:

  • Data centres
  • Server-based companies
Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version

In case you missed it

Managing security during unprecedented times of home working
Managing security during unprecedented times of home working

Companies are following government guidance and getting as many people as possible working from home. Some companies will have resisted home working in the past, but I’m certain that the sceptics will find that people can be productive with the right tools no matter where they are. A temporary solution will become permanent. But getting it right means managing risk. Access is king In a typical office with an on-premise data centre, the IT department has complete control over network access, internal networks, data, and applications. The remote worker, on the other hand, is mobile. He or she can work from anywhere using a VPN. Until just recently this will have been from somewhere like a local coffee shop, possibly using a wireless network to access the company network and essential applications. CV-19 means that huge numbers of people are getting access to the same desktop and files, and collaborative communication toolsBut as we know, CV-19 means that huge numbers of people are getting access to the same desktop and files, applications and collaborative communication tools that they do on a regular basis from the office or on the train. Indeed, the new generation of video conferencing technologies come very close to providing an “almost there” feeling. Hackers lie in wait Hackers are waiting for a wrong move amongst the panic, and they will look for ways to compromise critical servers. Less than a month ago, we emerged from a period of chaos. For months hackers had been exploiting a vulnerability in VPN products from Pulse Secure, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, and Citrix. Patches were provided by vendors, and either companies applied the patch or withdrew remote access. As a result, the problem of attacks died back.  But as companies race to get people working from home, they must ensure special care is taken to ensure the patches are done before switching VPNs on. That’s because remote desktop protocol (RDP) has been for the most part of 2019, and continues to be, the most important attack vector for ransomware. Managing a ransomware attack on top of everything else would certainly give you sleepless nights. As companies race to get people working from home, they must ensure special care is taken to ensure the patches are done before switching VPNs on Hackers are waiting for a wrong move amongst the panic, and they will look for ways to compromise critical serversExposing new services makes them also susceptible to denial of service attacks. Such attacks create large volumes of fake traffic to saturate the available capacity of the internet connection. They can also be used to attack the intricacies of the VPN protocol. A flow as little as 1Mbps can perturbate the VPN service and knock it offline. CIOs, therefore, need to acknowledge that introducing or extending home working broadens the attack surface. So now more than ever it’s vital to adapt risk models. You can’t roll out new services with an emphasis on access and usability and not consider security. You simply won’t survive otherwise. Social engineering Aside from securing VPNs, what else should CIO and CTOs be doing to ensure security? The first thing to do is to look at employee behaviour, starting with passwords. It’s highly recommended that strong password hygiene or some form of multi-factor authentication (MFA) is imposed. Best practice would be to get all employees to reset their passwords as they connect remotely and force them to choose a new password that complies with strong password complexity guidelines.  As we know, people have a habit of reusing their passwords for one or more online services – services that might have fallen victim to a breach. Hackers will happily It’s highly recommended that strong password hygiene or some form of multi-factor authentication (MFA) is imposedleverage these breaches because it is such easy and rich pickings. Secondly, the inherent fear of the virus makes for perfect conditions for hackers. Sadly, a lot of phishing campaigns are already luring people in with the promise of important or breaking information on COVID-19. In the UK alone, coronavirus scams cost victims over £800,000 in February 2020. A staggering number that can only go up. That’s why CIOs need to remind everyone in the company of the risks of clickbait and comment spamming - the most popular and obvious bot techniques for infiltrating a network. Notorious hacking attempts And as any security specialist will tell you, some people have no ethics and will exploit the horrendous repercussions of CV-19. In January we saw just how unscrupulous hackers are when they started leveraging public fear of the virus to spread the notorious Emotet malware. Emotet, first detected in 2014, is a banking trojan that primarily spreads through ‘malspam’ and attempts to sneak into computers to steal sensitive and private information. In addition, in early February the Maze ransomware crippled more than 230 workstations of the New Jersey Medical Diagnostics Lab and when they refused to pay, the vicious attackers leaked 9.5GB or research data in an attempt to force negotiations. And in March, an elite hacking group tried to breach the World Health Organization (WHO). It was just one of the many attempts on WHO and healthcare organisations in general since the pandemic broke. We’ll see lots more opportunist attacks like this in the coming months.   More speed less haste In March, an elite hacking group tried to breach the World Health Organization (WHO). It was just one of the many attempts on WHOFinally, we also have bots to contend with. We’ve yet to see reports of fake news content generated by machines, but we know there’s a high probability it will happen. Spambots are already creating pharmaceutical spam campaigns thriving on the buying behaviour of people in times of fear from infection. Using comment spamming – where comments are tactically placed in the comments following an update or news story - the bots take advantage of the popularity of the Google search term ‘Coronavirus’ to increase the visibility and ranking of sites and products in search results. There is clearly much for CIOs to think about, but it is possible to secure a network by applying some well thought through tactics. I believe it comes down to having a ‘more speed, less haste’ approach to rolling out, scaling up and integrating technologies for home working, but above all, it should be mixed with an employee education programme. As in reality, great technology and a coherent security strategy will never work if it is undermined by the poor practices of employees.

How does audio enhance security system performance?
How does audio enhance security system performance?

Video is widely embraced as an essential element of physical security systems. However, surveillance footage is often recorded without sound, even though many cameras are capable of capturing audio as well as video. Beyond the capabilities of cameras, there is a range of other audio products on the market that can improve system performance and/or expand capabilities (e.g., gunshot detection.) We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How does audio enhance the performance of security and/or video systems? 

How have standards changed the security market?
How have standards changed the security market?

A standard is a document that establishes uniform engineering or technical criteria, methods, processes, and/or practices. Standards surround every aspect of our business. For example, the physical security marketplace is impacted by industry standards, national and international standards, quality standards, building codes and even environmental standards, to name just a few. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How have standards changed the security market as we know it?