Digital Barriers plc, the technology company that provides live video streaming, facial recognition and video analytics technologies, completed a management buyout on Oct. 31. The transaction was backed by UK-based Volpi Capital. The now privately-owned company also recently announced that it has secured licences for its facial recognition technology into the automotive sector and is continuing to successfully evolve from hardware solutions to software licensing and channel sales.

SourceSecurity.com caught up with Zak Doffman, CEO of Digital Barriers, for some comments on these latest developments.

SourceSecurity.com: What advantages do you see for Digital Barriers of the new ownership structure — operating as a private company?

Doffman: The strategy for Digital Barriers remains the same: to deliver class-leading innovation within video security and surveillance across the intelligence, defence and law enforcement sectors. We are also now generating more of our revenues from software, channel sales and recurring licence fees, and that will be a big part of our future. Our business is now much more focused and aligned. We are a software business with genuinely world-class products which we are selling into a fast-growing global market, and we already count as our customers and partners some of the leading security and defence agencies in the world, as well as some of the largest technology and services companies in our space. We have always aspired to deliver game-changing, disruptive capabilities to the market, and that has never been more possible than it is now under our new structure.

SourceSecurity.com: Projections are that you will double your revenue to more than £50 million this financial year. Where is that growth coming from?

Doffman: Our revenues this year will primarily come from repeat customers across our regions, but we expect to see particular growth in the United States. Our channel sales are set to see real material growth, beyond the headline overall number, and our relatively nascent software licensing programme has made an exceptional start.

SourceSecurity.com: What positive trends do you see in the market and how will Digital Barriers leverage those trends?

Doffman: We operate in three areas, each of which is experiencing tremendous growth. First, we own a class-leading live video codec, able to deliver live streams at lower bandwidths than any other technology on the market. This technology was designed for military and law enforcement, but now can also be deployed in fleets of vehicles or on body worn devices or even smartphones, and of course CCTV cameras. As a trend, the growth of wireless video surveillance and security that we can enable by making this software more widely available is very exciting.

Facial recognition has been designed to work in the real world without special hardware and cameras
Facial recognition is now being deployed by traditional customers as well as for identity assurance in the mobility and automotive sectors

Second, we have developed a facial recognition solution that has been designed to work in the real world without special hardware and cameras. This is now being deployed by our traditional customers as well as for identity assurance by major players in the mobility and automotive sectors. The potential for this software over the coming years to be embedded in numerous applications and business processes is above and beyond anything we have seen as a company before.

Finally, our video analytics has already been licensed by major camera and VMS vendors, and continues to go from strength to strength, and with the emergence of major safe city programmes we expect to see further growth.

SourceSecurity.com: How do modern security threats such as terrorism and gun violence drive Digital Barriers' business? Can you provide an example or two of how the company's technology can address emerging security challenges? 

Doffman: We built our reputation as a business providing solutions to defence and security agencies around the world tasked with combatting terrorism and serious and organised crime. Those customers remain at the heart of our business, and whilst we build out our solutions to focus ever more on software and licensed revenues, we do so without neglecting the needs and requirements of those customers who have been instrumental in helping us get to this stage.

Live streaming video from body worn devices is the perfect example of this. Whether military or law enforcement, the difference in operational capability we can deliver over record-only solutions by providing live streaming, live access to a DVR, and live facial recognition, all from the same kind of device and the same kind of price point is genuinely night and day. Why simply collect stored video for a data warehouse, when we can provide eyes on the scene at any time, any place… providing exactly what’s needed, where it’s needed, when it’s needed. We can tick the same evidence management box as everyone else, but we can also do so much more.

SourceSecurity.com: What is the biggest challenge/opportunity the company faces in the next year?

Doffman: Our biggest challenge and opportunity over the next few years is shifting the balance of our revenues from being 80% solutions and 20% software licensing to the opposite. We are already engaging with partners around licensing world-class software into their solutions, providing them with clear differentiation into their own markets and customer bases. Our ability to scale in this way is changed markedly over the timing and investment associated with direct sales only.

Download PDF version

In case you missed it

What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?
What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?

A basic tenet of sales is ABC – always be closing. But it's a principle that most professional salespeople would say oversimplifies the process. Especially in a sophisticated, high-tech market such as physical security, the required sales skills are much more involved and nuanced. We asked this week's Expert Panel Roundtable: What unique characteristics are required of salespeople in the arena of physical security systems?

Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?
Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?

A futuristic alternative to plastic cards for access control and other applications is being considered by some corporate users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. The idea involves using a microchip device implanted into a user’s hand. About the size of a grain of rice and provided by Swedish company Biohax, the tiny device employs passive near field communication (NFC) to interface with a user’s digital environment. Access control is just one application for the device, which can be deployed in lieu of a smart card in numerous uses. Biohax says more than 4,000 individuals have implanted the device. Using the device for corporate employees Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the deviceCurrently Biohax is having dialogue with curious corporate customers about using the device for their employees. “It’s a dialogue, not Big Brother planning to chip every employee they have,” says Jowan Österlund, CEO at Biohax. Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the device. Data capture form to appear here! “Proof of concept” demonstrations have been conducted at several companies, including Tui, a travel company in Sweden that uses the device for access management, ID management, printing, gym access and self-checkout in the cafeteria. Biohax is also having dialogue with some big companies in the United Kingdom, including legal and financial firms. Österlund aims to have a full working system in place in the next year or so. A Swedish rail company accepts the implanted chip in lieu of a paper train ticket. They accept existing implants but are not offering to implant the chips. Österlund says his company currently has no plans to enter the U.S. market. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive Access control credential The device is inserted/injected below the skin between the index finger and the thumb. The circuitry has a 10-year lifespan. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive. The only risk is the possibility of infection, which is true anytime the skin is pierced, and the risk is mitigated by employing health professionals to inject the chip. Use of the device as an access control credential or any other function is offered as a voluntary option; any requirement by an employer to inject the device would be illegal, says Österlund. It’s a convenient choice that is made “based on a well-informed decision by the customer.” Aversion to needles, for example, would make some users squeamish to implant the device. More education of users helps to allay any concerns: Some 10% of employees typically would agree quickly to the system, but a larger group of 50% to 60% are likely to agree over time as they get more comfortable with the idea and understand the convenience, says Österlund. Protection of information The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rightsIn terms of privacy concerns, information contained on the device is in physical form and is protected. The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. There is no battery. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rights. With use of the device being discussed in the United Kingdom, there has been some backlash. For example, Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), has said: “Microchipping would give bosses even more power and control over their workers.” A big misconception is that the chip is a tracking device, says Österlund. It isn’t. “We love people to get informed,” says Österlund. “If they’re scared or apprehensive, they can just read up. It’s not used to control you – it’s used to give you control.”

Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?
Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?

Should ‘Made in China’ be seen as a negative in security systems and products? It’s an important and complex issue that merits a more detailed response than my recent comment in the Expert Panel Roundtable. For me, there are two sides of the answer to this question: Buying products that have certain negative attributes that are not in alignment with some part of a belief system or company mandate. Buying products that do not perform as advertised or do something that is unacceptable. For integrators and end users making the buying decisions, the drive to purchase products may not be based on either aspect and instead on the product that can do the best job for their business. But for others, a greater emphasis on the ethical implications of purchasing decisions drives decision-making. What is ethical consumption? Ethical consumption is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favouredEthical consumption — often called ethical consumerism — is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favoured, and products that are ethically questionable may be met with a ‘moral boycott’. This can be as simple as only buying organic produce or as complex as boycotting products made in a totalitarian regime that doesn't offer its citizens the same freedoms that we enjoy in the United States. Consider the goals of the Boston Tea Party or the National Consumers League (NCL), which was formed to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. Some examples of considerations behind ethical consumption include fair trade, treatment of workers, genetic modification, locally made and processed goods, union-made products and services, humane animal treatment, and in general, labour issues and manufacturing practices that take these factors into account. Increase in ethical consumption The numbers show that ethical consumption is on the rise. In a 2017 study by Unilever, 33 percent of consumers reported choosing to buy and support brands that they believe are doing social or environmental good. In the same study, 53 percent of shoppers in the United Kingdom and 78 percent in the United States said they feel better when they buy products that are ‘sustainably’ produced. There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities Though the aforementioned question that sparked this conversation centres around concerns with products made in China, there are many other countries where, for example, governments/dictators are extremely repressive to all or parts of their populations, whose products, such as oil, diamonds, minerals, etc., we happily consume. There are also a number of countries that are a threat in terms of cybersecurity. It may be naive and simplistic to single out Chinese manufacturers. Impact on physical security products Product buying decisions based on factors other than product functionality, quality and price are also starting to permeate the security marketplace. While this hasn't been a large focus area from the business-to-business consumption side, it's something that should be considered for commercial security products for a variety of reasons. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating" There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Last fall, 30 U.S. companies, including Apple and Amazon, were potentially compromised when it was discovered that a tiny microchip in the motherboard of servers built in China that weren't a part of the original specification. According to a Bloomberg report, “This attack was something graver than the software-based incidents the world has grown accustomed to seeing. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating, promising the kind of long-term, stealth access that spy agencies are willing to invest millions of dollars and many years to get.” This, along with many other incidents, are changing the considerations behind purchasing decisions even in the physical security industry. Given that physical security products in general have been lax on cybersecurity, this is a welcome change. Combating tech-specific threats In early January, members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors and ensure U.S. technological supremacy by improving interagency coordination across the U.S. government. The bill creates the Office of Critical Technologies & Security at the White House, an indication that this issue is of critical importance to a number of players across the tech sector. Members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors To address a significant number of concerns around ethical production, there are certifications such as ISO 26000 which provides guidance on social responsibility by addressing accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests, respect for rule of law, respect for international norms of behaviour and respect for human rights. While still emerging within physical security, companies that adhere to these and other standards do exist in the marketplace. Not buying products vulnerable to cyberattacks It may be counter-productive, even irresponsible, to brand all products from an entire country as unfit for purchasing. Some manufacturers’ products may be ethically questionable, or more vulnerable to cyberattacks than others; so not buying products made by those companies would make sense. The physical security industry might be playing a bit of catch up on this front, but I think we're beginning to see a shift toward this kind of responsible buying behaviour.