Video analytics will become more widespread as processor speeds and algorithms continue to improve
The police have a new IT system that could provide fast and secure transmission of video evidence
CCTV systems for public safety across Scotland are fragmented, lack strategic direction, are in parts obsolete and may be breaching data protection laws, according to an internal police report. With governments everywhere focusing on tightening security checks for public spaces, it is highly essential to have a robust security surveillance system in place. Government bodies must ensure that citizens are not put at risk due to obsolete video surveillance systems.

Reviewing public safety measures

The 2013 review by Police Scotland was recently released under freedom of information law and was published by the investigative website The Ferret. The report was produced in the wake of the establishment in April 2013 of Police Scotland, which replaced the eight previous regional police services and provides a single police force for Scotland.

The review paints a picture of near-crisis for Scotland’s public space CCTV with “negligible strategic leadership … in respect of governance, capital and revenue purchasing power.” It says that there have been significant instances when CCTV managers have found themselves “in crisis” with few funds to pay for staff, equipment and maintenance. In response, some CCTV control rooms have diversified and expanded funding by providing out-of-hours response services for local authorities, monitoring of community and intruder alarms, and CCTV monitoring of property. However, there are concerns that such moves might have a detrimental effect on the core function of monitoring public spaces.

System ownership and management is fragmented among 32 local authorities, Police Scotland, local authority and police partnerships, and trusts. The report recommends that statutory responsibility for the operation and maintenance of CCTV be allocated to a public body.

 Funding for CCTV cameras

Given the background of austerity and deep spending cuts to public services, it’s possible that funding could be withdrawn in the next round of negotiations. “All the local authorities who received revenue funding from legacy force areas have intimated that a financial contribution from the police is critical to maintain CCTV services,” the report says.

A previous report in 2009 warned that funding for systems across Scotland should be “urgently reviewed.” Several systems were becoming obsolete or beyond economical repair, and due to funding restrictions, not all cameras were continually displayed on monitors and/or were not fully monitored or maintained to a “fit for purpose” standard. No action was taken in response to this recommendation, says the 2013 report, and systems are continuing to age with no clearly identified strategy and direction as to how this will be funded in the future. “There continues to be no long-term funding strategies in place at the central or local government level to sustain the existing public space CCTV infrastructure.”

"It is clear that the estimated current revenue spend for public space CCTV in Scotland of approximately £11 million does not provide best value for the public purse"

Updating analogue systems

According to the report, 80 percent of cameras, 85 percent of matrices and 80 percent of transmission systems are analogue. These figures show that, although there have been some updates carried out, there is “a major piece of work required to turn around failing systems and to keep them fit for purpose.” Should a matrix fail, all the cameras linked to it would be inoperable, says the report.

It continues: “It is clear that the estimated current revenue spend for public space CCTV in Scotland of approximately £11 million does not provide best value for the public purse. There is a clear lack of strategic leadership and accountability for delivering a fully co-ordinated service with minimum standards in relation to specification of equipment, performance measures, policy and procedures, and to compliance with current legislation and guidance.”

In order to update analogue systems, around £3.8 million is needed to replace matrices, and £5.7 million is required to replace analogue cameras with digital ones. The report recommends that all matrices be upgraded to an agreed digital specification within the next five years, when the current contract with their suppliers expires.

The report also notes that:

  • The transition to digital should take place with an agreed standard of output.
  • High definition images will increasingly rely on computer networks and internet protocol for delivery.
  • Improvements in video compression and falling digital storage costs enable high definition images to be recorded economically.
  • Video analytics will become more widespread as processor speeds and algorithms continue to improve.
  • As digital recording media improves in speed and size, recording will be pushed to the edge within the camera.
  • The advance in wireless communications means that rapid deployment cameras will increase in number.

The report recommends that all matrices be upgraded to an agreed digital specification within the next five years, when the current contract with their suppliers expires

Apart from noting that only 19 of the 31 local authorities that responded have an internal audit mechanism to ensure compliance with the Data Protection Act, the introduction of body worn cameras is in doubt as far as data protection is concerned. “The management of these devices at a number of different offices is questionable in regards to compliance with the Information Commissioners Office guidance and legislative requirements.”

The future

So what might a revamped Scottish CCTV network look like? There is no common infrastructure for public CCTV at present, says the report, but this could change with the advent of the Scottish Wide Area Network (SWAN) for the public sector. In addition, video analytics could reduce the need for CCTV operators to monitor large numbers of images and could lead to a reduction in the number of staff needed.  The police also have a new IT system that could provide fast and secure transmission of video evidence to prosecuting and court officials. It is an “integrated electronic case management system supported by an electronic production system.” The system can add still and limited amounts of video footage, providing prosecutors with a unique production number and a full audit trail. 

Centralisation of CCTV network 

In a sign of difficulties ahead, the lack of a clear ownership and funding strategy can be seen in the differing views of local authorities and the police. According to the report, a number of local authorities have suggested that they do not have a statutory obligation to provide CCTV and that they see the police, prosecution authorities and the Scottish court service as the main beneficiaries. And not withstanding that at least some of the report can be inferred as a call for centralisation of Scottish CCTV, the police have denied they want to run a national CCTV network, telling PoliceProfessional.com that it is “not our responsibility” and that it sees the task as a local authorities-led initiative, with the Scottish government having a coordinating role.

So a shortfall in funding plus the increasing risk of obsolescence may be putting CCTV in Scotland in jeopardy. Are public space systems across the rest of the UK and beyond facing similar threats?

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version

Author profile

Ron Alalouff Contributing Editor, SourceSecurity.com

In case you missed it

COVID-19 worries boost prospects of touchless biometric systems
COVID-19 worries boost prospects of touchless biometric systems

Spread of the novel coronavirus has jolted awareness of hygiene as it relates to touching surfaces such as keypads. No longer in favour are contact-based modalities including use of personal identification numbers (PINs) and keypads, and the shift has been sudden and long-term. Both customers and manufacturers were taken by surprise by this aspect of the virus’s impact and are therefore scrambling for solutions. Immediate impact of the change includes suspension of time and attendance systems that are touch-based. Some two-factor authentication systems are being downgraded to RFID-only, abandoning the keypad and/or biometric components that contributed to higher security, but are now unacceptable because they involve touching. Touchless biometric systems in demand The trend has translated into a sharp decline in purchase of touch modality and a sharp increase in the demand for touchless systems, says Alex Zarrabi, President of Touchless Biometrics Systems (TBS). Biometrics solutions are being affected unequally, depending on whether they involve touch sensing, he says. Spread of the novel coronavirus has jolted awareness of hygiene as it relates to touching surfaces such as keypads “Users do not want to touch anything anymore,” says Zarrabi. “From our company’s experience, we see it as a huge catalyst for touchless suppliers. We have projects being accelerated for touchless demand and have closed a number of large contracts very fast. I’m sure it’s true for anyone who is supplying touchless solutions.” Biometric systems are also seeing the addition of thermal sensors to measure body temperature in addition to the other sensors driving the system. Fingerscans and hybrid face systems TBS offers 2D and 3D systems, including both fingerscans and hybrid face/iris systems to provide touchless identification at access control points. Contactless and hygienic, the 2D Eye system is a hybrid system that combines the convenience of facial technology with the higher security of iris recognition. The system recognises the face and then detects the iris from the face image and zeros in to scan the iris. The user experiences the system as any other face recognition system. The facial aspect quickens the process, and the iris scan heightens accuracy. TBS also offers the 2D Eye Thermo system that combines face, iris and temperature measurement using a thermal sensor module. TBS's 2D Eye Thermo system combines face, iris and temperature measurement using a thermal sensor module Another TBS system is a 3D Touchless Fingerscan system that provides accuracy and tolerance, anti-spoofing, and is resilient to water, oil, dust and dirt. The 2D+ Multispectral for fingerprints combines 2D sensing with “multispectral” subsurface identification, which is resilient to contaminants and can read fingerprints that are oily, wet, dry or damaged – or even through a latex glove. In addition, the 3D+ system by TBS provides frictionless, no-contact readings even for people going through the system in a queue. The system fills the market gap for consent-based true on-the-fly systems, says Zarrabi. The system captures properties of the hand and has applications in the COVID environment, he says. The higher accuracy and security ratings are suitable for critical infrastructure applications, and there is no contact; the system is fully hygienic. Integration with access control systems Integration of TBS biometrics with a variety of third-party access control systems is easy. A “middleware” subsystem is connected to the network. Readers are connected to the subsystem and also to the corporate access control system. An interface with the TBS subsystem coordinates with the access control system. For example, a thermal camera used as part of the biometric reader can override the green light of the access control system if a high temperature (suggesting COVID-19 infection, for example) is detected. The enrollment process is convenient and flexible and can occur at an enrollment station or at an administration desk. Remote enrollment can also be accomplished using images from a CCTV camera. All templates are encrypted. Remotely enrolled employees can have access to any location they need within minutes. The 3D+ system by TBS provides frictionless, no-contact readings even for people going through the system in a queue Although there are other touchless technologies available, they cannot effectively replace biometrics, says Zarrabi. For example, a centrally managed system that uses a Bluetooth signal from a smart phone could provide convenience, is “touchless,” and could suffice for some sites. However, the system only confirms the presence and “identity” of a smart phone – not the person who should be carrying it. “There has been a lot of curiosity about touchless, but this change is strong, and there is fear of a possible second wave of COVID-19 or a return in two or three years,” says Zarrabi. “We really are seeing customers seriously shifting to touchless.”

How to maximise your body temperature detection systems
How to maximise your body temperature detection systems

There are many companies jumping into selling temperature detection systems to the state, local governments, hospitals, airports and local businesses, but do they know how to drive one? Anyone can get behind a car and drive it into a wall by accident. The same can happen with a temperature detection system.  The first thing you should ask is “does my firm have a certified thermographer?”. If not, the firm are at risk of getting a low quality system that is being resold to make quick cash. Businesses that are doing this do not know how to operate it properly. Asking the right questions Secondly, you should ask whether the system is NDAA compliant. NDAA compliance means that your temperature detection equipment is protected by U.S. law. Does your system have a HSRP device (blackbody)? HSRP (Heat Source Reference Point) is a device that will allow the camera to detect the correct temperature a distance. Even if the room temperature does change throughout the day, treat it as a reference point for the camera to know the temperature at that distance. Can your system scan mutliple people at once? Can your system scan mutliple people at once? This is a bad question but often asked since most systems will say yes. For ease, everyone wants to scan many people at once, but the best practice according to FDA and CDC guidelines is to run one person at a time for best accuracy. Why? The HSRP (blackbody) device tells the camera what the correct temperature is at a given distance away from the camera. Every foot you are away from the HSRP device will be off by 0.1 degrees roughly. If you are in a room full of people, let's say 6, in view of the camera, every person that is not next to the HSRP device (5) will be given an inaccurate reading. Hence why it is so important to run the system correctly with just one person at a time. You will also need to follow the 6 feet rule. If you take that into consideration, one at a time at 6 feet apart, the device should tell you how you need to run the system. Sensitivity of thermal imaging Is your system’s sensor accurate enough? The FDA recommends an error of ±0.5°C or better. When looking for a system, make sure it is better than what they recommend. I would recommend ±0.3°C or better. Do not purchase a system over ±-.5°C degrees as you are doing yourself and your customers or employees an injustice.  Another thing to look at is how many pixels it can determine the temperature from. Some cameras can only tell the temperature of 6 points on the screen, whilst others can take a temperature reading from each pixel. Take a 384x288 camera, for example, which would be over 110,000 points of temperature taking on a single image.      Thermal cameras are very sensitive, so there are a lot of do’s and don’ts. For example, the system cannot see through glasses or hats. On the below image you can see a person with the visual camera on the right, whilst on the left side is through a thermal camera.  Both are pointing at the same area. It is clear the person on the left side is “invisible” to the thermal imaging camera. Demonstrating the sensitivity of thermal imaging If you are a company who wants to detect the temperature of customers or employees though the front door, window or a car window, the answer would be no. You need a clear line of sight without any interference to scan for temperatures. Other things you need to look out for is wind and distance away from the HSRP (blackbody) device. Air and distance away from the HSRP device will make the system less and less accurate the more space between the device. Air and distance away from the HSRP device will make the system less and less accurate Thermal imaging and COVID-19 If you have a clear line of sight, is there anything I need to know? The answer is yes. Reflective materials such as metal can interfere with your temperature readings. Reflective materials are easily picked up from the thermal side so pointing at a medal, glass or anything reflective can cause inaccuracies within the system. In the age of COVID-19, temperature detection systems are more important than ever. Organisations must get a system in place to help scan for high temperatures in order to reduce the spread of the virus.

What are the security challenges of the oil and gas market?
What are the security challenges of the oil and gas market?

Protecting the oil and gas market is key to a thriving economy. The list of security challenges for oil and gas requires the best technology solutions our industry has to offer, from physical barriers to video systems to cybersecurity. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: what are the security challenges of the oil and gas market?