If I asked you today how your video surveillance environment has changed over the past few years, how would you respond? I bet the answer could include the following options:

  • An increase in the number of cameras
  • The addition of more advanced technologies such as high-definition video, video analytics, 360-degree video devices, cloud-based services and more IT innovations.
  • Demand for more video data to drive business, IT and security initiatives.

Modern video surveillance

The modernisation of today’s video surveillance technology has changed the way video is being used and enhances the value it brings to an organisation. Now, stakeholders look for ways to glean new business or operational values from security technologies. Such uses include marketing, customer service, operational monitoring and employee training — all of which help show better return on investment.

One thing is for certain: video systems never get smaller. One of the big IT analyst firms released a study that indicated that this year, video surveillance is likely to be the biggest Big Data application in the world, generating 15 zettabytes of data this year. Let’s put that into perspective. Most people understand terabytes. 1,000 TB equals one petabyte. 1,000 PB is an exabyte (a massive amount of data). 1,000 exabytes is one zettabyte. Think about that: 15 billion terabytes of new data this year. The next closest application, according to Wikibon, is roughly half that amount.

Security directors can no longer tolerate problems that lead to downtime or data loss

Trends and demands of video

New uses for video drives massive data growth and, at the same exact time, data is more mission critical than ever before. These trends and demands place substantial pressure on server, storage and networking infrastructure — all things that can hinder the value systems can bring. As a result, security directors can no longer tolerate problems that lead to downtime or data loss. As you’re looking at deploying new technology or optimising your existing infrastructure, you need solutions that deliver robust performance, scalability and resiliency.

Because video is being used for more and more uses and in more and more places, downtime and data loss have a larger impact on your organisation than ever before, so it’s common to see surveillance now as part of the IT conversation. In fact, video is often owned partially by the IT department or is at least included in IT’s daily operating procedures. This is important to note because the IT world thinks differently about technology than the security world has in the past. However, IT’s mission is very similar to security; with a focus on reducing risk and lowering costs, and being asked to do so with fewer resources.

Challenges for traditional physical security

One of the most significant challenges for traditional security stakeholders has been learning to speak the language of IT and finding ways to meet the expectations of their IT leaders. Today’s IT departments expect server workloads to be virtualised to lower hardware costs, stronger management and control of a vast array of servers and applications, and better resiliency and scalability.

Traditional proprietary storage solutions will be overtaken by software-defined technology
Security infrastructure must adapt to match IT’s expectations of the modern data centre

Traditional physical security systems haven’t been compatible with server virtualisation, which quite frankly, it not acceptable as video surveillance consumes an increasing share of data centre resources. Security infrastructure must adapt to match IT’s expectations of the modern data centre.

Cost-efficient IT infrastructure

Today's IT departments are also in transition as an ever-increasing number of organisations seek to reduce their infrastructure footprints to both save money and become more eco-friendly. And, unlike the systems of old that were isolated on their own networks, today’s security solutions must “play well” with a number of other enterprise technologies that integrators will need to become familiar with.

To assist their efforts, IT leaders are turning to trends, such as cloud (public and private), mobility, flash and hyperconverged infrastructure. Regardless of the benefits of these specific trends, it’s all a part of a bigger initiative: a world built on software-based solutions.

A software-defined environment removes the need for dedicated, complex and proprietary hardware that required teams of people to manage and replicates it through software on standard off-the-shelf hardware solutions. This approach lowers costs and decreases complexity, while increasing the ability to scale. So, what does this mean in the world of video surveillance? It increases the capacity to adapt to new technology and changes the way stakeholders view the value of video surveillance — and how they use that video today and tomorrow.

Over the next decade, analysts predict that the $40 billion storage market will see significant disruption

Convergence Of IT And Physical Security

We’ve all seen it. There is a significant shift taking place within the security marketplace - we’re finally seeing the results of convergence! – and we’re also experiencing big changes in the traditional storage market as organisations look to store more and more data.

Over the next decade, analysts predict that the $40 billion storage market will see significant disruption, with traditional proprietary storage solutions overtaken by software-defined technology. What is even more interesting is that the companies leading this charge are far different from the big brands that IT teams are used to seeing within their data centres.

As IT becomes a greater force in the world of security, it is paramount that we all evaluate how these evolving processes and solutions will help organisations exceed their security goals and evolve video surveillance requirements. Understanding how the concepts mentioned above will change your role, your department and your business will allow you to be well-positioned for the future — and the future is bright.

Download PDF version

Author profile

In case you missed it

What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?
What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?

A basic tenet of sales is ABC – always be closing. But it's a principle that most professional salespeople would say oversimplifies the process. Especially in a sophisticated, high-tech market such as physical security, the required sales skills are much more involved and nuanced. We asked this week's Expert Panel Roundtable: What unique characteristics are required of salespeople in the arena of physical security systems?

Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?
Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?

A futuristic alternative to plastic cards for access control and other applications is being considered by some corporate users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. The idea involves using a microchip device implanted into a user’s hand. About the size of a grain of rice and provided by Swedish company Biohax, the tiny device employs passive near field communication (NFC) to interface with a user’s digital environment. Access control is just one application for the device, which can be deployed in lieu of a smart card in numerous uses. Biohax says more than 4,000 individuals have implanted the device. Using the device for corporate employees Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the deviceCurrently Biohax is having dialogue with curious corporate customers about using the device for their employees. “It’s a dialogue, not Big Brother planning to chip every employee they have,” says Jowan Österlund, CEO at Biohax. Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the device. Data capture form to appear here! “Proof of concept” demonstrations have been conducted at several companies, including Tui, a travel company in Sweden that uses the device for access management, ID management, printing, gym access and self-checkout in the cafeteria. Biohax is also having dialogue with some big companies in the United Kingdom, including legal and financial firms. Österlund aims to have a full working system in place in the next year or so. A Swedish rail company accepts the implanted chip in lieu of a paper train ticket. They accept existing implants but are not offering to implant the chips. Österlund says his company currently has no plans to enter the U.S. market. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive Access control credential The device is inserted/injected below the skin between the index finger and the thumb. The circuitry has a 10-year lifespan. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive. The only risk is the possibility of infection, which is true anytime the skin is pierced, and the risk is mitigated by employing health professionals to inject the chip. Use of the device as an access control credential or any other function is offered as a voluntary option; any requirement by an employer to inject the device would be illegal, says Österlund. It’s a convenient choice that is made “based on a well-informed decision by the customer.” Aversion to needles, for example, would make some users squeamish to implant the device. More education of users helps to allay any concerns: Some 10% of employees typically would agree quickly to the system, but a larger group of 50% to 60% are likely to agree over time as they get more comfortable with the idea and understand the convenience, says Österlund. Protection of information The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rightsIn terms of privacy concerns, information contained on the device is in physical form and is protected. The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. There is no battery. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rights. With use of the device being discussed in the United Kingdom, there has been some backlash. For example, Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), has said: “Microchipping would give bosses even more power and control over their workers.” A big misconception is that the chip is a tracking device, says Österlund. It isn’t. “We love people to get informed,” says Österlund. “If they’re scared or apprehensive, they can just read up. It’s not used to control you – it’s used to give you control.”

Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?
Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?

Should ‘Made in China’ be seen as a negative in security systems and products? It’s an important and complex issue that merits a more detailed response than my recent comment in the Expert Panel Roundtable. For me, there are two sides of the answer to this question: Buying products that have certain negative attributes that are not in alignment with some part of a belief system or company mandate. Buying products that do not perform as advertised or do something that is unacceptable. For integrators and end users making the buying decisions, the drive to purchase products may not be based on either aspect and instead on the product that can do the best job for their business. But for others, a greater emphasis on the ethical implications of purchasing decisions drives decision-making. What is ethical consumption? Ethical consumption is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favouredEthical consumption — often called ethical consumerism — is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favoured, and products that are ethically questionable may be met with a ‘moral boycott’. This can be as simple as only buying organic produce or as complex as boycotting products made in a totalitarian regime that doesn't offer its citizens the same freedoms that we enjoy in the United States. Consider the goals of the Boston Tea Party or the National Consumers League (NCL), which was formed to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. Some examples of considerations behind ethical consumption include fair trade, treatment of workers, genetic modification, locally made and processed goods, union-made products and services, humane animal treatment, and in general, labour issues and manufacturing practices that take these factors into account. Increase in ethical consumption The numbers show that ethical consumption is on the rise. In a 2017 study by Unilever, 33 percent of consumers reported choosing to buy and support brands that they believe are doing social or environmental good. In the same study, 53 percent of shoppers in the United Kingdom and 78 percent in the United States said they feel better when they buy products that are ‘sustainably’ produced. There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities Though the aforementioned question that sparked this conversation centres around concerns with products made in China, there are many other countries where, for example, governments/dictators are extremely repressive to all or parts of their populations, whose products, such as oil, diamonds, minerals, etc., we happily consume. There are also a number of countries that are a threat in terms of cybersecurity. It may be naive and simplistic to single out Chinese manufacturers. Impact on physical security products Product buying decisions based on factors other than product functionality, quality and price are also starting to permeate the security marketplace. While this hasn't been a large focus area from the business-to-business consumption side, it's something that should be considered for commercial security products for a variety of reasons. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating" There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Last fall, 30 U.S. companies, including Apple and Amazon, were potentially compromised when it was discovered that a tiny microchip in the motherboard of servers built in China that weren't a part of the original specification. According to a Bloomberg report, “This attack was something graver than the software-based incidents the world has grown accustomed to seeing. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating, promising the kind of long-term, stealth access that spy agencies are willing to invest millions of dollars and many years to get.” This, along with many other incidents, are changing the considerations behind purchasing decisions even in the physical security industry. Given that physical security products in general have been lax on cybersecurity, this is a welcome change. Combating tech-specific threats In early January, members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors and ensure U.S. technological supremacy by improving interagency coordination across the U.S. government. The bill creates the Office of Critical Technologies & Security at the White House, an indication that this issue is of critical importance to a number of players across the tech sector. Members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors To address a significant number of concerns around ethical production, there are certifications such as ISO 26000 which provides guidance on social responsibility by addressing accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests, respect for rule of law, respect for international norms of behaviour and respect for human rights. While still emerging within physical security, companies that adhere to these and other standards do exist in the marketplace. Not buying products vulnerable to cyberattacks It may be counter-productive, even irresponsible, to brand all products from an entire country as unfit for purchasing. Some manufacturers’ products may be ethically questionable, or more vulnerable to cyberattacks than others; so not buying products made by those companies would make sense. The physical security industry might be playing a bit of catch up on this front, but I think we're beginning to see a shift toward this kind of responsible buying behaviour.