Cloud computing has many benefits, including greater flexibility, infrastructure cost savings, and enhanced computing performance. However, the cloud presents new security challenges that organisations need to address. A failure to implement security controls and adhere to solid data governance practices could result in a breach.

Preventing worst case scenarios

Consider this scenario, a company begins their migration by getting excited about the possibilities the cloud can provide to their applications. They task a few of infrastructure engineers to work with the developers to start a proof of concept. The migration team modifies the settings and access controls to ensure the application is works.

The migration team, excited with the success of their proof of concept, adds in a few more application features and submits the change ticket for the applications to be moved into production. The migration then grids to a halt. An assessment comes back saying the cloud environment has security holes so large you could drive a truck through them. The migration team discusses how to adjust the cloud application to meet compliance requirements, only to find out they need to completely rebuild the entire cloud environment. The organisation executives pull the funding on the now failed project and any future discussions about the cloud are met with frustration.

One of the benefits of cloud computing is that you won’t have to log into every virtual machine to maintain it; you can use code

Sadly, this scenario isn’t rare. However, there are things you can do to make sure this scenario doesn’t happen to you.

Four ways to improve your cloud security

1. Understand how the cloud changes your paradigms

While cloud security and in-house security have many similarities, in some ways, they are quite different, which requires a paradigm shift on the part of the organisation:

  • Use automation to make your life easier. One of the benefits of cloud computing is that you won’t have to log into every virtual machine to maintain it; you can use code. For example, AWS has several features to automate some security functions, including security groups, which act as firewalls for EC2 instances; network access control lists (ACLs), which act as firewalls for associated subnets; and flow logs, which capture information about the IP traffic going to and from the network interfaces in your virtual private cloud. 

  • Be aware of where your cloud provider’s responsibilities begin and end. While there are some differences depending on your specific setup (private, public, or SaaS), in general, cloud providers are responsible for security of the cloud, and their customers are responsible for security in the cloud. This means that your cloud provider must secure the cloud infrastructure, but your organisation is responsible for the applications, data, and services you place within your cloud environment. Remember, if there is a breach, your organisation is the one who is ultimately responsible.
How to plan a cloud migration security policy
Written cloud security and data governance policies must be established before the migration commences

 

2. Create your governance and project plans before you start

  • Define limits on what data classification types you will allow in the cloud. Written cloud security and data governance policies must be established before the migration commences. These policies should clearly define which information and data classifications are to be stored in the cloud, where they belong in the cloud hierarchy, who should have access to each section, and what level of access they should have.

  • Create and follow a project plan. Successful cloud migrations are never built on luck and you should develop a project plan for your migration, just as you would for any other large project. Additionally, be realistic about your scope as cloud migration projects often fail because organisations often try to build too much in their scope. Conversely, if you have not defined what will be in-scope for your cloud environment, then it’s likely you will have some poor architecture design elements that could be easily exploited by hackers. 

  • Stick with your plan, and don’t “chase the shiny.” There always seems to be a new “silver bullet” tool hitting the market that promises to solve all your tech problems, security and otherwise, overnight. Resist the urge to deviate from your cloud migration plan in favour of these tools. They almost never turn out to be as magical as they promise, and you’ll end up wasting money and time.

3. Use your past to change your organisation’s future

Cloud migration is a long, tedious process, but it’s also a great opportunity for your company to assess all the old issues you’ve been gritting your teeth and dealing with, and start over with a clean slate.

Many organisations are appointing “home-grown” administrators who have
little or no training in cloud computing or cloud security

Start by picking a specific target, such as a single application or system. Then, review your asset and application inventory, along with your old architecture map. Identify all interdependencies and determine how they will work in the cloud environment – or if they even make sense anymore. Don’t repeat your in-house mistakes in the cloud.

Update your disaster recovery and security incident response plan. Since your data environment is fundamentally changing, your disaster recovery and security response plan needs to change, too.

Define who will support and maintain your cloud environment once it’s in production. You must also decide which team within your organisation will manage your cloud security during migration and going forward. This needs to be done by someone with adequate security experience; it should not simply be assigned to the help desk.

4. Don’t hesitate to obtain expert help

The biggest contributor to the outbreak of AWS breaches is a lack of expertise. AWS and other cloud environments are very powerful. They are also intricate and highly complex, yet many organisations are appointing “home-grown” administrators who – while they may be very well-versed in in-house data security – have little or no training in cloud computing or cloud security.

If you do not have sufficient cloud expertise in-house, it’s imperative that you partner with a managed security services provider (MSSP) with deep experience in your chosen cloud environment. In addition to ensuring that your environment is configured properly and securely, an MSSP can help you develop a realistic migration plan; address governance, risk, and compliance issues; identify in-house data governance issues and ensure that the same mistakes are not replicated in the cloud; and provide cyber security and incident response services going forward.

Download PDF version

Author profile

Andy Jordan Special Project Lead, Mosaic451

In case you missed it

What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?
What characteristics do salespeople require in the physical security industry?

A basic tenet of sales is ABC – always be closing. But it's a principle that most professional salespeople would say oversimplifies the process. Especially in a sophisticated, high-tech market such as physical security, the required sales skills are much more involved and nuanced. We asked this week's Expert Panel Roundtable: What unique characteristics are required of salespeople in the arena of physical security systems?

Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?
Can microchip implants replace plastic cards in modern access control?

A futuristic alternative to plastic cards for access control and other applications is being considered by some corporate users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. The idea involves using a microchip device implanted into a user’s hand. About the size of a grain of rice and provided by Swedish company Biohax, the tiny device employs passive near field communication (NFC) to interface with a user’s digital environment. Access control is just one application for the device, which can be deployed in lieu of a smart card in numerous uses. Biohax says more than 4,000 individuals have implanted the device. Using the device for corporate employees Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the deviceCurrently Biohax is having dialogue with curious corporate customers about using the device for their employees. “It’s a dialogue, not Big Brother planning to chip every employee they have,” says Jowan Österlund, CEO at Biohax. Every user is given plenty of information to make an informed decision whether they want to use the device. Data capture form to appear here! “Proof of concept” demonstrations have been conducted at several companies, including Tui, a travel company in Sweden that uses the device for access management, ID management, printing, gym access and self-checkout in the cafeteria. Biohax is also having dialogue with some big companies in the United Kingdom, including legal and financial firms. Österlund aims to have a full working system in place in the next year or so. A Swedish rail company accepts the implanted chip in lieu of a paper train ticket. They accept existing implants but are not offering to implant the chips. Österlund says his company currently has no plans to enter the U.S. market. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive Access control credential The device is inserted/injected below the skin between the index finger and the thumb. The circuitry has a 10-year lifespan. The device is large enough to locate easily and extract if needed, and small enough to be unobtrusive. The only risk is the possibility of infection, which is true anytime the skin is pierced, and the risk is mitigated by employing health professionals to inject the chip. Use of the device as an access control credential or any other function is offered as a voluntary option; any requirement by an employer to inject the device would be illegal, says Österlund. It’s a convenient choice that is made “based on a well-informed decision by the customer.” Aversion to needles, for example, would make some users squeamish to implant the device. More education of users helps to allay any concerns: Some 10% of employees typically would agree quickly to the system, but a larger group of 50% to 60% are likely to agree over time as they get more comfortable with the idea and understand the convenience, says Österlund. Protection of information The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rightsIn terms of privacy concerns, information contained on the device is in physical form and is protected. The passive device does not actively send out any signals as you walk. There is no battery. It is only powered up by a reader if a user has access rights. With use of the device being discussed in the United Kingdom, there has been some backlash. For example, Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), has said: “Microchipping would give bosses even more power and control over their workers.” A big misconception is that the chip is a tracking device, says Österlund. It isn’t. “We love people to get informed,” says Österlund. “If they’re scared or apprehensive, they can just read up. It’s not used to control you – it’s used to give you control.”

Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?
Ethical consumption: should you buy security products ‘Made in China’?

Should ‘Made in China’ be seen as a negative in security systems and products? It’s an important and complex issue that merits a more detailed response than my recent comment in the Expert Panel Roundtable. For me, there are two sides of the answer to this question: Buying products that have certain negative attributes that are not in alignment with some part of a belief system or company mandate. Buying products that do not perform as advertised or do something that is unacceptable. For integrators and end users making the buying decisions, the drive to purchase products may not be based on either aspect and instead on the product that can do the best job for their business. But for others, a greater emphasis on the ethical implications of purchasing decisions drives decision-making. What is ethical consumption? Ethical consumption is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favouredEthical consumption — often called ethical consumerism — is a type of consumer activism that is based on the concept of ‘positive buying’ in that ethical products are favoured, and products that are ethically questionable may be met with a ‘moral boycott’. This can be as simple as only buying organic produce or as complex as boycotting products made in a totalitarian regime that doesn't offer its citizens the same freedoms that we enjoy in the United States. Consider the goals of the Boston Tea Party or the National Consumers League (NCL), which was formed to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. Some examples of considerations behind ethical consumption include fair trade, treatment of workers, genetic modification, locally made and processed goods, union-made products and services, humane animal treatment, and in general, labour issues and manufacturing practices that take these factors into account. Increase in ethical consumption The numbers show that ethical consumption is on the rise. In a 2017 study by Unilever, 33 percent of consumers reported choosing to buy and support brands that they believe are doing social or environmental good. In the same study, 53 percent of shoppers in the United Kingdom and 78 percent in the United States said they feel better when they buy products that are ‘sustainably’ produced. There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities Though the aforementioned question that sparked this conversation centres around concerns with products made in China, there are many other countries where, for example, governments/dictators are extremely repressive to all or parts of their populations, whose products, such as oil, diamonds, minerals, etc., we happily consume. There are also a number of countries that are a threat in terms of cybersecurity. It may be naive and simplistic to single out Chinese manufacturers. Impact on physical security products Product buying decisions based on factors other than product functionality, quality and price are also starting to permeate the security marketplace. While this hasn't been a large focus area from the business-to-business consumption side, it's something that should be considered for commercial security products for a variety of reasons. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating" There’s clear evidence that products from some Chinese companies suffer from cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Last fall, 30 U.S. companies, including Apple and Amazon, were potentially compromised when it was discovered that a tiny microchip in the motherboard of servers built in China that weren't a part of the original specification. According to a Bloomberg report, “This attack was something graver than the software-based incidents the world has grown accustomed to seeing. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating, promising the kind of long-term, stealth access that spy agencies are willing to invest millions of dollars and many years to get.” This, along with many other incidents, are changing the considerations behind purchasing decisions even in the physical security industry. Given that physical security products in general have been lax on cybersecurity, this is a welcome change. Combating tech-specific threats In early January, members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors and ensure U.S. technological supremacy by improving interagency coordination across the U.S. government. The bill creates the Office of Critical Technologies & Security at the White House, an indication that this issue is of critical importance to a number of players across the tech sector. Members of the U.S. Senate introduced bipartisan legislation to help combat tech-specific threats to national security posed by foreign actors To address a significant number of concerns around ethical production, there are certifications such as ISO 26000 which provides guidance on social responsibility by addressing accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests, respect for rule of law, respect for international norms of behaviour and respect for human rights. While still emerging within physical security, companies that adhere to these and other standards do exist in the marketplace. Not buying products vulnerable to cyberattacks It may be counter-productive, even irresponsible, to brand all products from an entire country as unfit for purchasing. Some manufacturers’ products may be ethically questionable, or more vulnerable to cyberattacks than others; so not buying products made by those companies would make sense. The physical security industry might be playing a bit of catch up on this front, but I think we're beginning to see a shift toward this kind of responsible buying behaviour.