It seems every company is seeking to re-invent itself in our changing market. A case in point is AMAG, which has long been associated with access control. Today, AMAG’s proposition to the market is much broader than that, now also encompassing Symmetry CONNECT, a policy-based platform providing safety, security and risk management capabilities enabling organisations to manage their enterprise security functions. This spring, AMAG is introducing Symmetry GUEST, a new identity management system. They also have Symmetry CompleteView, a closely integrated video management component (OEM’d from Salient Systems). All this in addition to the core Symmetry Access Control product. 

Broader approach to security operations & technology for better customer outcome

At AMAG’s 2016 Security Engineering Symposium, I had a chance to discuss AMAG’s new, broader approach with Kurt Takahashi, Senior Vice President of Sales. He’s definitely more a “vision guy” than a “product guy,” and he shared a broad vision for AMAG that focuses on operations as well as technology, and on ensuring a good customer outcome. 

"We want to change the perception in the market that we’re only an access control company" says Kurt Takahashi, Senior VP of Sales, AMAG

“For a company like ours, known to be an access control company, my vision is to get people to see us in a broader light of a policy-based platform that builds a foundation both from the technological and the operational roadmap,” Takahashi says. “Together, that’s our value proposition.”

The “policy-based platform” is Symmetry CONNECT, which adds an identity management aspect and a “smart engine” that enables AMAG integrators to automate processes to police the system and ensure customers’ success with it. If it sounds like a physical security information management system (PSIM) or a physical identity and access management (PIAM) system, it’s not an accident. Takahashi acknowledges Symmetry CONNECT shares features with those (typically more expensive) systems.

Simplifying PSIM & PIAM for greater adoption

“We are looking to simplify it, because most companies don’t use the full functionality [of a PSIM or a PIAM],” he comments. “We try to look at the key elements that people use most of the time and implement those into our solution, so we can operationalise our platforms. That policy engine embodies the key elements of a PSIM and a PIAM into our platform, so we can extend the value of Symmetry.” (Takahashi was previously Vice President of North American Sales at Quantum Secure, a PIAM company.) 

“We aren’t trying to shove technology down people’s throats; we are seeking to look at the broader operational value of it,” he says. “At the end of the day, that’s a game changer. I don’t just want to sell a bunch of hardware; I want to sell a solution that addresses the operational need.” 

The broader approach plays particularly well among larger enterprise customers, especially those in highly regulated industries and/or who have complex system requirements. A public company subject to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance (requiring data centre audits, for example) can make good use of such a system, as might a utility seeking to meet NERC/FERC requirements. “How do those things work?” says Takahashi. “The needs of customers are changing and becoming more complex. Technology is more advanced. That’s where you can make a big difference and differentiate yourself by adopting this methodology, whether you’re a consultant, an integrator, a technology person or an operator. I think the market is hungry for this type of discussion.” 

Breaking the stereotype of access control companies

Takahashi talks about “operationalising the technology,” that is, to bring disparate systems together and make it easy for clients to solve three core issues – cost, risk and compliance. He concedes it’s a challenge to get the message out.

"We aren’t trying to shove technology down people’s throats; we are seeking to look at the broader operational value of it. I don’t just want to sell a bunch of hardware; I want to sell a solution that addresses the operational need"

“We want to change the perception in the market that we’re only an access control company,” he says.

“It’s all about the outcome and customer experience from an operational perspective. It takes evangelism and education of that message to the market – what our solution actually does, how it helps, how it is different, and why it matters.”

Takahashi says: “The biggest ‘ah-ha’ moment I have with clients and partners is when I have this operational discussion. Traditionally, people have solved the operational challenge with more people. What happens is, you need more people because it’s so manual and disjointed. The ‘ah-ha’ moment I have with most people is when you start talking about operational efficiencies and how you can change that. What takes 30 steps today can take you two steps tomorrow using technology. But most people aren’t having that conversation. They are just assuming I’ll sell you a system and you will know what to do with it.” 

“When I talk to consultants and tell them what we are doing, they say it’s about time an access control company took on this problem,” Takahashi adds. “Until now, they had to buy a new piece of third-party software and lay it on top, and it’s too expensive and they have to maintain the integrations. Now we have the technology, and it works with Symmetry and extends the operational value of Symmetry by allowing them the same feature sets. It’s not a full-blown identity management system, but we have taken some of the key things that people use every day and incorporated them.”

It’s an automation approach that has been used in the IT arena for years. “Those of us in physical security are the only ones not doing it,” says Takahashi.

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version

Author profile

Larry Anderson Editor, SecurityInformed.com & SourceSecurity.com

An experienced journalist and long-time presence in the US security industry, Larry is SourceSecurity.com's eyes and ears in the fast-changing security marketplace, attending industry and corporate events, interviewing security leaders and contributing original editorial content to the site. He leads SourceSecurity.com's team of dedicated editorial and content professionals, guiding the "editorial roadmap" to ensure the site provides the most relevant content for security professionals.

In case you missed it

Managing security during unprecedented times of home working
Managing security during unprecedented times of home working

Companies are following government guidance and getting as many people as possible working from home. Some companies will have resisted home working in the past, but I’m certain that the sceptics will find that people can be productive with the right tools no matter where they are. A temporary solution will become permanent. But getting it right means managing risk. Access is king In a typical office with an on-premise data centre, the IT department has complete control over network access, internal networks, data, and applications. The remote worker, on the other hand, is mobile. He or she can work from anywhere using a VPN. Until just recently this will have been from somewhere like a local coffee shop, possibly using a wireless network to access the company network and essential applications. CV-19 means that huge numbers of people are getting access to the same desktop and files, and collaborative communication toolsBut as we know, CV-19 means that huge numbers of people are getting access to the same desktop and files, applications and collaborative communication tools that they do on a regular basis from the office or on the train. Indeed, the new generation of video conferencing technologies come very close to providing an “almost there” feeling. Hackers lie in wait Hackers are waiting for a wrong move amongst the panic, and they will look for ways to compromise critical servers. Less than a month ago, we emerged from a period of chaos. For months hackers had been exploiting a vulnerability in VPN products from Pulse Secure, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, and Citrix. Patches were provided by vendors, and either companies applied the patch or withdrew remote access. As a result, the problem of attacks died back.  But as companies race to get people working from home, they must ensure special care is taken to ensure the patches are done before switching VPNs on. That’s because remote desktop protocol (RDP) has been for the most part of 2019, and continues to be, the most important attack vector for ransomware. Managing a ransomware attack on top of everything else would certainly give you sleepless nights. As companies race to get people working from home, they must ensure special care is taken to ensure the patches are done before switching VPNs on Hackers are waiting for a wrong move amongst the panic, and they will look for ways to compromise critical serversExposing new services makes them also susceptible to denial of service attacks. Such attacks create large volumes of fake traffic to saturate the available capacity of the internet connection. They can also be used to attack the intricacies of the VPN protocol. A flow as little as 1Mbps can perturbate the VPN service and knock it offline. CIOs, therefore, need to acknowledge that introducing or extending home working broadens the attack surface. So now more than ever it’s vital to adapt risk models. You can’t roll out new services with an emphasis on access and usability and not consider security. You simply won’t survive otherwise. Social engineering Aside from securing VPNs, what else should CIO and CTOs be doing to ensure security? The first thing to do is to look at employee behaviour, starting with passwords. It’s highly recommended that strong password hygiene or some form of multi-factor authentication (MFA) is imposed. Best practice would be to get all employees to reset their passwords as they connect remotely and force them to choose a new password that complies with strong password complexity guidelines.  As we know, people have a habit of reusing their passwords for one or more online services – services that might have fallen victim to a breach. Hackers will happily It’s highly recommended that strong password hygiene or some form of multi-factor authentication (MFA) is imposedleverage these breaches because it is such easy and rich pickings. Secondly, the inherent fear of the virus makes for perfect conditions for hackers. Sadly, a lot of phishing campaigns are already luring people in with the promise of important or breaking information on COVID-19. In the UK alone, coronavirus scams cost victims over £800,000 in February 2020. A staggering number that can only go up. That’s why CIOs need to remind everyone in the company of the risks of clickbait and comment spamming - the most popular and obvious bot techniques for infiltrating a network. Notorious hacking attempts And as any security specialist will tell you, some people have no ethics and will exploit the horrendous repercussions of CV-19. In January we saw just how unscrupulous hackers are when they started leveraging public fear of the virus to spread the notorious Emotet malware. Emotet, first detected in 2014, is a banking trojan that primarily spreads through ‘malspam’ and attempts to sneak into computers to steal sensitive and private information. In addition, in early February the Maze ransomware crippled more than 230 workstations of the New Jersey Medical Diagnostics Lab and when they refused to pay, the vicious attackers leaked 9.5GB or research data in an attempt to force negotiations. And in March, an elite hacking group tried to breach the World Health Organization (WHO). It was just one of the many attempts on WHO and healthcare organisations in general since the pandemic broke. We’ll see lots more opportunist attacks like this in the coming months.   More speed less haste In March, an elite hacking group tried to breach the World Health Organization (WHO). It was just one of the many attempts on WHOFinally, we also have bots to contend with. We’ve yet to see reports of fake news content generated by machines, but we know there’s a high probability it will happen. Spambots are already creating pharmaceutical spam campaigns thriving on the buying behaviour of people in times of fear from infection. Using comment spamming – where comments are tactically placed in the comments following an update or news story - the bots take advantage of the popularity of the Google search term ‘Coronavirus’ to increase the visibility and ranking of sites and products in search results. There is clearly much for CIOs to think about, but it is possible to secure a network by applying some well thought through tactics. I believe it comes down to having a ‘more speed, less haste’ approach to rolling out, scaling up and integrating technologies for home working, but above all, it should be mixed with an employee education programme. As in reality, great technology and a coherent security strategy will never work if it is undermined by the poor practices of employees.

How does audio enhance security system performance?
How does audio enhance security system performance?

Video is widely embraced as an essential element of physical security systems. However, surveillance footage is often recorded without sound, even though many cameras are capable of capturing audio as well as video. Beyond the capabilities of cameras, there is a range of other audio products on the market that can improve system performance and/or expand capabilities (e.g., gunshot detection.) We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How does audio enhance the performance of security and/or video systems? 

How have standards changed the security market?
How have standards changed the security market?

A standard is a document that establishes uniform engineering or technical criteria, methods, processes, and/or practices. Standards surround every aspect of our business. For example, the physical security marketplace is impacted by industry standards, national and international standards, quality standards, building codes and even environmental standards, to name just a few. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How have standards changed the security market as we know it?