Access control failed the journalists and other victims at the offices of “Charlie Hebdo” under extraordinary circumstances

Right after the Paris terrorist attacks, a headline I read throughout the media asked: “Did intelligence services drop the ball?” The question has a familiar ring, and you’ll find variations on it throughout the last and present centuries concerning events that range from presidential assassinations to 9/11, 7/7 in London and the 2008 Mumbai bombings.

But physical security, rather than information gathering, is our scope here. From the moment I saw thermal imaging cameras being used from helicopters to track the movements of the Kouachi brothers through a forest in Picardy, I thought of the advertising slogans used by camera manufacturers to the effect that you can’t hide your body heat.

Access control failed the journalists and other victims at the offices of Charlie Hebdo under extraordinary circumstances in which cartoonist Corine Rey was forced (at the end of the barrel of a Kalashnikov) to type her access code into a keypad after gunmen threatened to kill her toddler daughter. Biometric safeguards might have prevented the incursion by the terrorists. However, with the magazine having just published an edition whose front cover features a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad, it’s a safe bet to say that this is an organisation whose staff is unlikely to be cowed into a restrictive regime that would impede their core business of producing a satirical magazine. It should also be noted that our normal perspective of access control at commercial premises is irrelevant in the face of jihadists armed with an RPG and Molotov cocktails.

While defiant in their willingness to satirise Islam, the Charlie Hebdo staff was not wilful in flouting the usual dictates of security. Knowing that a meeting attended by their editor and all their principal cartoonists was a potential flashpoint, they had a police officer present. (He was among the fatalities.) In 2006, Charlie Hebdo was among a handful of publications worldwide to reprint unpixelated versions of cartoons depicting the Prophet that had originated from the Danish newspaper Jylland-Posten, and in 2011 its Île-de-France headquarters was fire-bombed after the Prophet was depicted on a front cover.

From the viewpoint of CCTV, it’s interesting to note that police were able to “hijack” the IP camera feeds from the Hyper Cacher kosher supermarket in an eastern suburb of Paris on the Friday and glean information on the unfolding crisis as Amedy Coulibaly held hostages inside. While insecure and vulnerable CCTV may remain a concern in our industry, the police’s ability to monitor this footage without alerting Coulibaly may have helped to save lives when the shop was finally stormed by 30 elite armed officers. There is irony in the fact that cameras that must have been installed merely to guard against low-grade retail shrinkage proved crucial in a worldwide news story.

At one time thought to be in the supermarket with Coulibaly, his partner Hayat Boumeddiene (now the world’s most wanted woman) has been seen on good quality CCTV footage dating from 2 January at an airport in Istanbul, Turkey, on her way to Syria, which she entered the day before her partner took control of the supermarket and the day he shot a police officer.

From the viewpoint of CCTV, it’s interesting to note that police were able to “hijack” the IP camera feeds from the Hyper Cacher kosher supermarket in an eastern suburb of Paris
There is likely to be more transparency and genuine debate on the full range of physical security measures in France

So what’s the likely impact of the magazine and supermarket attacks on physical security measures in France? Former president Sarkozy indicated that he wanted “vidéoprotection” to go mainstream, and he set a target of increasing the number of nationwide public space video cameras from 20,000 to 60,000. Research by Paris-based Cnil suggests that 71 percent of French citizens approve of public space CCTV, although the Interior Ministry has said it is keen to avoid indiscriminate “Anglo-Saxon-style” urban surveillance. Surprisingly, the CCTV debate in France has divided down political lines with socialist mayors in Nice and Carcasonne being in favour of security cameras.

Sarkozy’s successor, François Hollande, has 17 deaths and 21 injuries (many of them critical) on his watch. The Mairie de Paris (the Paris municipal administration) has embarked on a €200m programme that is giving police access to 13,000 public and private cameras, a number that presumably includes those vital video feeds from the Hyper Cacher supermarket. The 20 police stations in the capital will all have a surveillance room giving access to the central control room in the Île de la Cité that includes the Charlie Hebdo office. (It should be noted that the magazine’s staff is currently working from a temporary office at a sister publication under a massive security operation.)

As he battled last week with the worst terrorist incident in France since paramilitaries opposed to Algerian independence bombed a Strasbourg-to-Paris train in 1961, Bernard Boucault (Préfet de Police) could exploit an increasingly widespread and sophisticated CCTV system. Many of the new cameras have been installed around the Paris arrondissements with their targets being accident black spots, major public spaces and areas known for delinquency. The country remains opposed to ANPR (license plate recognition), and while 1,000 new roadside cameras have been installed, few of these scan number plates since the French prefer to integrate the technology into machine vision devices within gendarmerie and customs police vehicles. There is widespread distrust of ANPR cameras, and they are rare. The fact that the Kouachi brothers were able to use three different cars (two of them stolen) and, by my reckoning, cover at least 200 miles without detection may now reduce opposition to highway license plate scanning.

As I type this, Richard Malka, a lawyer for Charlie Hebdo has declared that the magazine will “cede nothing to terrorists,” and the government is sending 10,000 troops to protect possible trouble spots such as synagogues, Jewish schools and mosques. Watching what has been estimated as a crowd of 1.5 million people taking to the streets of Paris on Sunday, I noticed many banners declaring “We love the police.” French equivalents of “Big Brother Watch” have lost significant ground in recent days as cameras have proved their worth, and there is likely to be more transparency and genuine debate on the full range of physical security measures in France, extending beyond CCTV to biometric access control and perimeter intrusion prevention.

More on this story
Paris terrorism attacks reflect a problem larger than us
Looking at security in light of the Paris attacks  

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version

Author profile

Jeremy Malies European Correspondent,

Jeremy Malies is a veteran marketeer and writer specialising in the physical security sector which he has covered for 20 years. He has specific interests in video analytics, video management, perimeter intrusion and access control.

In case you missed it

COVID-19 worries boost prospects of touchless biometric systems
COVID-19 worries boost prospects of touchless biometric systems

Spread of the novel coronavirus has jolted awareness of hygiene as it relates to touching surfaces such as keypads. No longer in favour are contact-based modalities including use of personal identification numbers (PINs) and keypads, and the shift has been sudden and long-term. Both customers and manufacturers were taken by surprise by this aspect of the virus’s impact and are therefore scrambling for solutions. Immediate impact of the change includes suspension of time and attendance systems that are touch-based. Some two-factor authentication systems are being downgraded to RFID-only, abandoning the keypad and/or biometric components that contributed to higher security, but are now unacceptable because they involve touching. Touchless biometric systems in demand The trend has translated into a sharp decline in purchase of touch modality and a sharp increase in the demand for touchless systems, says Alex Zarrabi, President of Touchless Biometrics Systems (TBS). Biometrics solutions are being affected unequally, depending on whether they involve touch sensing, he says. Spread of the novel coronavirus has jolted awareness of hygiene as it relates to touching surfaces such as keypads “Users do not want to touch anything anymore,” says Zarrabi. “From our company’s experience, we see it as a huge catalyst for touchless suppliers. We have projects being accelerated for touchless demand and have closed a number of large contracts very fast. I’m sure it’s true for anyone who is supplying touchless solutions.” Biometric systems are also seeing the addition of thermal sensors to measure body temperature in addition to the other sensors driving the system. Fingerscans and hybrid face systems TBS offers 2D and 3D systems, including both fingerscans and hybrid face/iris systems to provide touchless identification at access control points. Contactless and hygienic, the 2D Eye system is a hybrid system that combines the convenience of facial technology with the higher security of iris recognition. The system recognises the face and then detects the iris from the face image and zeros in to scan the iris. The user experiences the system as any other face recognition system. The facial aspect quickens the process, and the iris scan heightens accuracy. TBS also offers the 2D Eye Thermo system that combines face, iris and temperature measurement using a thermal sensor module. TBS's 2D Eye Thermo system combines face, iris and temperature measurement using a thermal sensor module Another TBS system is a 3D Touchless Fingerscan system that provides accuracy and tolerance, anti-spoofing, and is resilient to water, oil, dust and dirt. The 2D+ Multispectral for fingerprints combines 2D sensing with “multispectral” subsurface identification, which is resilient to contaminants and can read fingerprints that are oily, wet, dry or damaged – or even through a latex glove. In addition, the 3D+ system by TBS provides frictionless, no-contact readings even for people going through the system in a queue. The system fills the market gap for consent-based true on-the-fly systems, says Zarrabi. The system captures properties of the hand and has applications in the COVID environment, he says. The higher accuracy and security ratings are suitable for critical infrastructure applications, and there is no contact; the system is fully hygienic. Integration with access control systems Integration of TBS biometrics with a variety of third-party access control systems is easy. A “middleware” subsystem is connected to the network. Readers are connected to the subsystem and also to the corporate access control system. An interface with the TBS subsystem coordinates with the access control system. For example, a thermal camera used as part of the biometric reader can override the green light of the access control system if a high temperature (suggesting COVID-19 infection, for example) is detected. The enrollment process is convenient and flexible and can occur at an enrollment station or at an administration desk. Remote enrollment can also be accomplished using images from a CCTV camera. All templates are encrypted. Remotely enrolled employees can have access to any location they need within minutes. The 3D+ system by TBS provides frictionless, no-contact readings even for people going through the system in a queue Although there are other touchless technologies available, they cannot effectively replace biometrics, says Zarrabi. For example, a centrally managed system that uses a Bluetooth signal from a smart phone could provide convenience, is “touchless,” and could suffice for some sites. However, the system only confirms the presence and “identity” of a smart phone – not the person who should be carrying it. “There has been a lot of curiosity about touchless, but this change is strong, and there is fear of a possible second wave of COVID-19 or a return in two or three years,” says Zarrabi. “We really are seeing customers seriously shifting to touchless.”

How to maximise your body temperature detection systems
How to maximise your body temperature detection systems

There are many companies jumping into selling temperature detection systems to the state, local governments, hospitals, airports and local businesses, but do they know how to drive one? Anyone can get behind a car and drive it into a wall by accident. The same can happen with a temperature detection system.  The first thing you should ask is “does my firm have a certified thermographer?”. If not, the firm are at risk of getting a low quality system that is being resold to make quick cash. Businesses that are doing this do not know how to operate it properly. Asking the right questions Secondly, you should ask whether the system is NDAA compliant. NDAA compliance means that your temperature detection equipment is protected by U.S. law. Does your system have a HSRP device (blackbody)? HSRP (Heat Source Reference Point) is a device that will allow the camera to detect the correct temperature a distance. Even if the room temperature does change throughout the day, treat it as a reference point for the camera to know the temperature at that distance. Can your system scan mutliple people at once? Can your system scan mutliple people at once? This is a bad question but often asked since most systems will say yes. For ease, everyone wants to scan many people at once, but the best practice according to FDA and CDC guidelines is to run one person at a time for best accuracy. Why? The HSRP (blackbody) device tells the camera what the correct temperature is at a given distance away from the camera. Every foot you are away from the HSRP device will be off by 0.1 degrees roughly. If you are in a room full of people, let's say 6, in view of the camera, every person that is not next to the HSRP device (5) will be given an inaccurate reading. Hence why it is so important to run the system correctly with just one person at a time. You will also need to follow the 6 feet rule. If you take that into consideration, one at a time at 6 feet apart, the device should tell you how you need to run the system. Sensitivity of thermal imaging Is your system’s sensor accurate enough? The FDA recommends an error of ±0.5°C or better. When looking for a system, make sure it is better than what they recommend. I would recommend ±0.3°C or better. Do not purchase a system over ±-.5°C degrees as you are doing yourself and your customers or employees an injustice.  Another thing to look at is how many pixels it can determine the temperature from. Some cameras can only tell the temperature of 6 points on the screen, whilst others can take a temperature reading from each pixel. Take a 384x288 camera, for example, which would be over 110,000 points of temperature taking on a single image.      Thermal cameras are very sensitive, so there are a lot of do’s and don’ts. For example, the system cannot see through glasses or hats. On the below image you can see a person with the visual camera on the right, whilst on the left side is through a thermal camera.  Both are pointing at the same area. It is clear the person on the left side is “invisible” to the thermal imaging camera. Demonstrating the sensitivity of thermal imaging If you are a company who wants to detect the temperature of customers or employees though the front door, window or a car window, the answer would be no. You need a clear line of sight without any interference to scan for temperatures. Other things you need to look out for is wind and distance away from the HSRP (blackbody) device. Air and distance away from the HSRP device will make the system less and less accurate the more space between the device. Air and distance away from the HSRP device will make the system less and less accurate Thermal imaging and COVID-19 If you have a clear line of sight, is there anything I need to know? The answer is yes. Reflective materials such as metal can interfere with your temperature readings. Reflective materials are easily picked up from the thermal side so pointing at a medal, glass or anything reflective can cause inaccuracies within the system. In the age of COVID-19, temperature detection systems are more important than ever. Organisations must get a system in place to help scan for high temperatures in order to reduce the spread of the virus.

What are the security challenges of the oil and gas market?
What are the security challenges of the oil and gas market?

Protecting the oil and gas market is key to a thriving economy. The list of security challenges for oil and gas requires the best technology solutions our industry has to offer, from physical barriers to video systems to cybersecurity. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: what are the security challenges of the oil and gas market?