
Digital and Network video recorder terminology: Dispelling myths
Most DVRs tend to have an Ethernet interface of some kind in order to connect DVRs to a network to give them remote management functionality. So network DVRs would appear to have networking capabilities. However, these are principally analogue in the sense that it is analogue signals that are received and digitised. Lets establish that network DVRs are essentially DVRs that can connect to a LAN or Internet to provide remote management and the ability to view live footage and playback stored footage from a distant location. If we take this as accurate, why is the somewhat artificial distinction thrown around? Is it an effort to make clear to the purchaser what exactly it is that they're buying? Or is it used as a marketing technique to try and make certain products sound better even though the general consensus is that all DVRs have the option for this network capability?
This term refers to video recorders that can digitise and store analogue feeds like the conventional DVR, but also receive and record IP feeds with added network capabilities for remote access and management. Similarly to the way an Ethernet interface is seen as standard on DVRs sometimes referred to as ‘Network DVRs', coping with both analogue and IP inputs is considered standard for most mid to high-end DVRs. Which once again begs the question why is a new term given to products that are deemed the norm? It simply adds to the confusion about which products do what and how. Is this a marketing strategy to advertise the fact these new ‘hybrids' are all singing all dancing combinations of DVRs and NVRs? If most, if not all, DVRs have both an Ethernet interface, and can deal with both types of input feed, why not use one umbrella term for them all? This could put an end to the confusion by differentiating between NVRs that purely record IP inputs over a network, and all the other products on the market which seem to be a mixture of both technologies one way or another. Managing the video recording conundrum So, if you're thinking of installing a video recording device, which one should you go for? With the different types available, coupled with the terminology confusion, this can prove more of an issue than most would like. Ask yourself: Do I have an existing video recording system that it will need to integrate with? What kind of security cameras will it be receiving data from? How do I want to store the recordings? Do I want to have remote access to them? Once you have determined the answers to these questions, you can figure out what kind of technical capabilities your recording device will need to have. From here, go straight to the heart of the matter: If you know the capabilities you need, read the technical specification and make sure it can do all you need it to. Who cares what the gizmo is called as long as it does what's needed!
|
Hirsch designs and manufactures security systems for worldwide markets. Hirsch's award-winning security and identity management systems integrate access control, video surveillance, intrusion detection, digital certificates, smart cards and biometrics.
Hirsch is part of SCM Microsystems, Inc., provider of the world's broadest range of smart card readers. Together, SCM and Hirsch bring convergence to reality by integrating physical and logical security. Their solutions enable organisations and individuals to secure their facilities, computers and commerce.
SCM and Hirsch customers achieve the risk mitigation, cost reduction, and reputation protection that lead to success. (NASDAQ: SCMM, Prime Standard: SMY)